首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine. >Thoracolumbar junction injuries after motor vehicle collision: are there differences in restrained and nonrestrained front seat occupants?
【24h】

Thoracolumbar junction injuries after motor vehicle collision: are there differences in restrained and nonrestrained front seat occupants?

机译:机动车碰撞后胸腰椎交界处受伤:前排乘员的约束和不约束有区别吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECT: Motor vehicle collision (MVC) is one of the most common causes of thoracolumbar junction (TLJ) injury. Although there is little doubt that the use of seat belts reduces the incidence and severity of TLJ injury after MVC, the mechanism by which this is protective against TLJ injury for drivers and passengers is relatively unknown. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with TLJ (T11-L2) injury who were front seat occupants of a four-wheeled vehicle at the time of MVC (frontal crash) were admitted between 2000 and 2004. The 39 patients were divided into two groups: 18 who had been restrained and 21 who had not been restrained at the time of the MVC. Patient demographics, including the mean Injury Severity Scale score, incidence of neurological deficit, level of TLJ injury, and type of TLJ injury according to the Denis classification were compared. RESULTS: The incidence of neurological deficit in the restrained group was significantly lower compared with the nonrestrained group (5.6% compared with 33.3%, p < 0.05). The incidence of flexion-distraction/fracture-dislocation injuries in the restrained group was also significantly lower (0.0% compared with 33.3% in the nonrestrained group, p < 0.01). The restrained group was significantly older (37.4 +/- 3.6 years compared with 28.0 +/- 2.5 years in the nonrestrained group, p < 0.05), but otherwise there were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the patients' demographic data. CONCLUSIONS: It is likely that the high incidence of neurological deficit in the nonrestrained front seat motor vehicle occupants who had a TLJ injury was mostly due to the high incidence of flexion-distraction/fracture-dislocation injuries. This retrospective study indirectly shows the efficacy of three-point seat belt systems in reducing the severity of a TLJ injury after an MVC. Compression/burst fractures still occur in restrained front seat occupants, however, and elucidation of the injury mechanism of such axial loading fractures may be important to improve safety further for automobile occupants.
机译:目的:机动车碰撞(MVC)是胸腰椎交界处(TLJ)受伤的最常见原因之一。尽管毫无疑问的是,使用安全带可以降低MVC造成TLJ伤害的发生率和严重程度,但是这种保护驾驶员和乘客免​​受TLJ伤害的机制却相对未知。方法:2000年至2004年期间收治了39例TLJ(T11-L2)损伤患者,他们在MVC(额度碰撞)发生时是四轮车的前座乘员。这39例患者分为两组:到MVC时,有18名被克制的人和21名没有被克制的人。比较了患者的人口统计资料,包括平均损伤严重程度评分,神经功能缺损的发生率,TLJ损伤的水平以及根据Denis分类的TLJ损伤的类型。结果:与非约束组相比,约束组的神经功能缺损发生率显着降低(5.6%比33.3%,p <0.05)。约束组的屈伸/骨折脱位伤害发生率也显着降低(0.0%,而非约束组为33.3%,p <0.01)。约束组的年龄明显更大(37.4 +/- 3.6年,而非约束组为28.0 +/- 2.5年,p <0.05),但是在两组患者的人口统计学数据上没有显着差异。结论:未受约束的前座TLJ机动车乘员中神经功能缺损的发生率较高的主要原因可能是屈伸/骨折/脱位损伤的发生率较高。这项回顾性研究间接显示了三点式安全带系统在降低MVC后TLJ损伤严重程度方面的功效。在受约束的前排乘员中仍然会发生压缩/爆裂骨折,但是,阐明这种轴向载荷骨折的伤害机制对于进一步提高汽车乘员的安全性可能很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号