首页> 外文期刊>Clinical oral implants research >Fatigue resistance and failure mode of CAD/CAM composite resin implant abutments restored with type III composite resin and porcelain veneers.
【24h】

Fatigue resistance and failure mode of CAD/CAM composite resin implant abutments restored with type III composite resin and porcelain veneers.

机译:用III型复合树脂和瓷贴面修复的CAD / CAM复合树脂种植体基台的抗疲劳性和破坏​​模式。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the fatigue resistance and failure mode of type III porcelain and composite resin veneers bonded to custom composite resin implant abutments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using the CEREC 3 machine, 28 composite resin implant abutments (Paradigm MZ100) were fabricated along with non-retentive type III veneers, milled either in ceramic Paradigm C (n=14) or in composite resin Paradigm MZ100 (n=14). The intaglio surfaces of the veneers were hydrofluoric acid etched and silanated (Paradigm C) or airborne-particle abraded and silanated (MZ100). The fitting surface of the abutments was airborne-particle abraded, cleaned, silanated and inserted into a bone level implant (10 mm, BLI RC). All veneers were luted with adhesive resin (Optibond FL) and a preheated light curing composite resin (Filtek Z100). Cyclic isometric chewing (5 Hz, 30 degrees angle) was simulated, starting with a load of 40 N, followed by stages of 80, 120, 160, 200, 240 and 280 N (20,000 cycles each). Samples were loaded until fracture or to a maximum of 140,000 cycles. Groups were compared using the life table survival analysis (Log rank test at P=0.05). Previously published data using same-design zirconia abutments were included for comparison. RESULTS: Paradigm C and MZ100 specimens fractured at an average load of 243 and 206 N (survival rate of 21% and 0%), respectively, with a significant difference in survival probability (P=0.02). Fractured specimens presented mixed failure modes and solely adhesive failures were not observed. The survival of composite resin abutments was similar to that of identical zirconia abutments from a previous study (P=0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Non-retentive porcelain veneers bonded to custom composite resin implant abutments presented a higher survival rate when compared with composite resin veneers. Survival of composite resin abutment did not differ from zirconia ones.
机译:目的:本研究评估了粘结到定制复合树脂植入物基台上的III型瓷和复合树脂贴面的抗疲劳性和破坏​​模式。材料和方法:使用CEREC 3机器,制造28个复合树脂植入物基台(Paradigm MZ100)以及非保持性III型贴面,并在陶瓷Paradigm C(n = 14)或复合树脂Paradigm MZ100(n = 14)。胶合板的凹版表面经过氢氟酸蚀刻和硅烷化(Paradigm C)或气载颗粒被研磨和硅烷化(MZ100)。基台的安装面经过空气颗粒磨蚀,清洁,硅烷化,然后插入骨级植入物(10毫米,BLI RC)中。所有胶合板都用粘合树脂(Optibond FL)和预热的光固化复合树脂(Filtek Z100)进行胶合。模拟了循环等距咀嚼(5 Hz,30度角),从40 N的负载开始,接着是80、120、160、200、240和280 N的阶段(每个循环20,000个)。加载样品直至断裂或最多140,000个循环。使用生命表生存分析(P = 0.05的对数秩检验)对各组进行比较。包括以前发布的使用相同设计的氧化锆基台的数据进行比较。结果:范式C和MZ100标本分别以243和206 N的平均载荷断裂(存活率分别为21%和0%),存活概率差异显着(P = 0.02)。断裂的样品呈现出混合破坏模式,没有观察到单独的粘附破坏。复合树脂基台的寿命与先前研究中相同的氧化锆基台的寿命相似(P = 0.76)。结论:与复合树脂贴面相比,粘结到定制复合树脂植入物基台上的非保持性瓷贴面具有更高的存活率。复合树脂基台的存活率与氧化锆基体无差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号