首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Multivariate Analysis: An International Journal >A comparative study of Gaussian geostatistical models and Gaussian Markov random field models
【24h】

A comparative study of Gaussian geostatistical models and Gaussian Markov random field models

机译:高斯地统计模型与高斯马尔可夫随机场模型的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Gaussian geostatistical models (GGMs) and Gaussian Markov random fields (GMRFs) are two distinct approaches commonly used in spatial models for modeling point-referenced and areal data, respectively. In this paper, the relations between GGMs and GMRFs are explored based on approximations of GMRFs by GGMs, and approximations of GGMs by GMRFs. Two new metrics of approximation are proposed : (i) the Kullback-Leibier discrepancy of spectral densities and (ii) the chi-squared distance between spectral densities. The distances between the spectral density functions of GGMs and GMRFs measured by these metrics are minimized to obtain the approximations of GGMs and GMRFs. The proposed methodologies are validated through several empirical studies. We compare the performance of our approach to other methods based on covariance functions, in terms of the average mean squared prediction error and also the computational time. A spatial analysis of a dataset on PM2.5 collected in California is presented to illustrate the proposed method. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:高斯地统计模型(GGM)和高斯马尔可夫随机场(GMRF)是空间模型中通常用于分别建模点参考和面数据的两种不同方法。本文基于GGM对GMRF的近似和GMRF对GGM的近似,探讨了GGM与GMRF之间的关系。提出了两个新的近似度量:(i)光谱密度的Kullback-Leibier差异和(ii)光谱密度之间的卡方距离。通过这些度量测得的GGM和GMRF的光谱密度函数之间的距离被最小化,以获得GGM和GMRF的近似值。通过一些实证研究验证了所提出的方法。在平均均方预测误差和计算时间方面,我们将我们的方法与基于协方差函数的其他方法的性能进行比较。提出了对加州收集的PM2.5数据集的空间分析,以说明该方法。 (c)2008 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号