首页> 外文期刊>Clinical oncology >The malthus programme - a new tool for estimating radiotherapy demand at a local level
【24h】

The malthus programme - a new tool for estimating radiotherapy demand at a local level

机译:马尔萨斯计划-一种在地方水平上估计放疗需求的新工具

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The radiotherapy delivery service in England is emerging from a 25 year blight on strategic planning and forecasting of radiotherapy demand. Two of the most influential documents used as evidence for renovation and expansion in radiotherapy services are the Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) equipment, workload and staffing survey [1} and the National Radiotherapy Advisory Group (NRAG) report [2]. Where the RCR survey quantified significant variation in allocation and consumption of radiotherapy resources across England and Wales, the NRAG 2007 report generated national targets for radiotherapy service provision in terms of fraction burden (40,000 fractions per million of population by 2010 and up to 54,000 fractions per million by 2016) and the proportion of cancer patients receiving radiotherapy at some point in their cancer journey (access rate), which was estimated at 52% [3]. Although the NRAG model has been instrumental in providing evidence of radiotherapy under provision, it has proven difficult for clinicians and local commissioning groups to apply the model at a regional level, just as the RCR report would have predicted. Independent of any differences in clinical practice among radiation oncologists across the country, local variation in radiotherapy demand is driven by differences in population demographics and age distribution, co-morbidity, disease incidence and variation in the diagnostic and surgical pathways leading to radiotherapy treatment. It clear that a national 'best fit' model cannot provide a good fit for commissioning and service provision at the local level.
机译:英格兰的放射治疗服务已经摆脱了25年对放射治疗需求的战略规划和预测的困境。皇家放射科医生学院(RCR)的设备,工作量和人员调查[1]和国家放射治疗咨询小组(NRAG)的报告[2]是用于放射治疗服务的翻新和扩展的最有影响力的两个文件。在RCR调查量化了英格兰和威尔士各地放射治疗资源分配和消耗的显着差异的情况下,NRAG 2007报告针对分数负担(到2010年每百万人口中有40,000分数,每百万人口中有多达54,000分数)制定了放射治疗服务提供的国家目标。到2016年达到100亿),癌症患者在癌症历程中某点接受放疗的比例(访问率)估计为52%[3]。尽管NRAG模型在提供已提供的放射治疗证据方面发挥了作用,但事实证明,正如RCR报告所预计的那样,临床医生和当地委托小组很难在区域级别应用该模型。与全国放射肿瘤医师在临床实践上的任何差异无关,放疗需求的局部差异是由人口统计学和年龄分布,合并症,疾病发生率以及导致放射疗法治疗的诊断和手术途径的差异所致。很明显,国家的“最合适”模式无法为地方一级的调试和服务提供提供合适的条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号