首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neural transmission >The effect of the interval-between-sessions on prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cognitive outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

The effect of the interval-between-sessions on prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cognitive outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:会议之间的间隔对前额经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对认知结果的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recently, there has been wide interest in the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on cognitive functioning. However, many methodological questions remain unanswered. One of them is whether the time interval between active and sham-controlled stimulation sessions, i.e. the interval between sessions (IBS), influences DLPFC tDCS effects on cognitive functioning. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed of experimental studies published in PubMed, Science Direct, and other databases from the first data available to February 2016. Single session sham-controlled within-subject studies reporting the effects of tDCS of the DLPFC on cognitive functioning in healthy controls and neuropsychiatric patients were included. Cognitive tasks were categorized in tasks assessing memory, attention, and executive functioning. Evaluation of 188 trials showed that anodal vs. sham tDCS significantly decreased response times and increased accuracy, and specifically for the executive functioning tasks, in a sample of healthy participants and neuropsychiatric patients (although a slightly different pattern of improvement was found in analyses for both samples separately). The effects of cathodal vs. sham tDCS (45 trials), on the other hand, were not significant. IBS ranged from less than 1 h to up to 1 week (i.e. cathodal tDCS) or 2 weeks (i.e. anodal tDCS). This IBS length had no influence on the estimated effect size when performing a meta-regression of IBS on reaction time and accuracy outcomes in all three cognitive categories, both for anodal and cathodal stimulation. Practical recommendations and limitations of the study are further discussed.
机译:最近,人们对背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)的经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对认知功能的影响引起了广泛关注。但是,许多方法论问题仍然没有答案。其中之一是活动和假控制刺激之间的时间间隔,即会话之间的间隔(IBS)是否影响DLPFC tDCS对认知功能的影响。因此,对从PubMed,Science Direct和其他数据库中发表的实验研究进行了系统的回顾和荟萃分析,该研究从2016年2月开始获得了第一批可用数据。单节假对照受试者内研究报告了DLPFC的tDCS的影响包括健康对照和神经精神病患者的认知功能。认知任务分为评估记忆力,注意力和执行功能的任务。对188个试验的评估表明,在健康参与者和神经精神病患者的样本中,阳极vs假tDCS显着缩短了响应时间并提高了准确度,特别是对于执行功能任务(尽管在这两种分析中发现的改善方式略有不同)分别取样)。另一方面,阴极与假tDCS的影响(45个试验)并不显着。 IBS的范围从不到1小时到长达1周(即阴极tDCS)或2周(即阳极tDCS)。在对阳极和阴极刺激的所有三个认知类别中,IBS对反应时间和准确度结果进行荟萃回归时,IBS的长度对估计的效应量没有影响。进一步讨论了该研究的实用建议和局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号