...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical oncology >Volumetric-modulated arc therapy in head and neck radiotherapy: a planning comparison using simultaneous integrated boost for nasopharynx and oropharynx carcinoma.
【24h】

Volumetric-modulated arc therapy in head and neck radiotherapy: a planning comparison using simultaneous integrated boost for nasopharynx and oropharynx carcinoma.

机译:头颈部放射治疗中的容积调制弧光治疗:使用同时集成增强技术治疗鼻咽癌和口咽癌的计划比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

AIMS: Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) allows rapid delivery of radiotherapy. The aim of this planning study was to evaluate VMAT and dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using a simultaneous integrated boost technique PATIENTS AND METHODS: Planning computed tomography data from 10 patients with locoregionally advanced oropharynx or nasopharynx carcinoma were selected. The prescription dose was 70, 63 and 56Gy to the high-dose, intermediate-dose and low-dose planning target volume (PTV), respectively, and planning parameters were according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group IMRT protocols. VMAT and IMRT plans were calculated, and dose-volume histograms were created for plan evaluation and comparison. RESULTS: Clinically acceptable plans were achieved for both IMRT and VMAT plans, although IMRT plans typically required three times the number of monitor units. The coverage of 95% of the PTV70 was between 96 and 100% of the prescribed dose for IMRT plans and 100% for all VMAT plans. There was a trend of improved dose conformity for IMRT plans. Both IMRT and VMAT achieved acceptable plans in terms of sparing of the spinal cord and brainstem. Contralateral parotid sparing was improved with VMAT, with a mean dose of 25.08Gy (range 21.35-30.02Gy) for oropharynx and 31.37Gy (range 23.47-35.52Gy) for nasopharynx cases. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous integrated boost VMAT achieved comparable plans to dynamic IMRT in complex head and neck cases and used two-thirds less monitor units.
机译:目的:容积调制电弧治疗(VMAT)可以快速进行放射治疗。这项计划研究的目的是使用同步综合增强技术评估VMAT和动态强度调制放射治疗(IMRT)。患者和方法:选择10例局部区域晚期口咽或鼻咽癌患者的计算机断层扫描数据。处方剂量分别为大剂量,中剂量和低剂量计划目标体积(PTV)的70、63和56Gy,并且计划参数根据放射治疗肿瘤学集团IMRT协议进行。计算了VMAT和IMRT计划,并创建了剂量-体积直方图以进行计划评估和比较。结果:尽管IMRT计划通常需要监视单元数量的三倍,但IMRT和VMAT计划均达到了临床可接受的计划。对于IMRT计划,PTV70的95%覆盖率在规定剂量的96%至100%之间,对于所有VMAT计划,其覆盖率均为100%。 IMRT计划有改善剂量一致性的趋势。在保留脊髓和脑干方面,IMRT和VMAT均达到了可接受的计划。 VMAT改善了对侧腮腺保留,口咽平均剂量为25.08Gy(范围为21.35-30.02Gy),鼻咽平均剂量为31.37Gy(范围为23.47-35.52Gy)。结论:在复杂的头颈部病例中,同时集成的升压VMAT实现了与动态IMRT相当的计划,并且使用的监视单元减少了三分之二。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号