...
首页> 外文期刊>The TQM Journal >TOULON-VERONA CONFERENCE BEST PAPERS: Differences between public administrators' and elected officials' perspectives on the role of the citizen in service quality improvement processes
【24h】

TOULON-VERONA CONFERENCE BEST PAPERS: Differences between public administrators' and elected officials' perspectives on the role of the citizen in service quality improvement processes

机译:土伦-维罗纳会议最佳论文:公共行政人员和民选官员对公民在服务质量改善过程中的作用的看法之间的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - According to the "New Public Management" paradigm, citizens are viewed as active participants through all the different steps of service planning and provision. Nonetheless, citizens' involvement is still far from being systematically applied within local governments. The purpose of this paper is to give a contribution to this stream of research by investigating whether a part of this resistance could be explained by the differences between public administrators and elected officials' perspectives on the role of the citizens in service quality improvement processes. Design/methodology/approach - A mail survey was conducted among a sample of Italian town municipalities in May and June of 2010. A total of 102 questionnaires were returned (59 from politicians and 43 from public managers), and these questionnaires were then analysed through t-tests and regressions. Findings - Findings support the existence of a statistically significant difference between public administrators' and elected officials' attitudes. Differences exist in three main issues: the relative importance of citizens as sources of inputs to improve public service quality, the objectives of citizens' involvement and the structure of citizens' preferences. Research limitations/implications - Results could have been influenced by the degree of New Public Management development within the specific research setting (Italian local governments). Practical implications - Formalising the role, the timing and the contribution of citizens' involvement to the municipal decision-making process could help to mitigate the mentioned dualism. Creating a favourable cultural background and sharing a citizen-oriented vision within the whole organisation, from top levels to front-line employees, is fundamental. Originality/value - This paper is the first to suggest that these resistances toward involving citizens in quality improvement processes could be due to the differences between administrators' and elected officials' perspectives.
机译:目的-根据“新公共管理”范式,通过服务规划和提供的所有不同步骤,公民被视为积极参与者。但是,在地方政府内部还没有系统地应用公民的参与。本文的目的是通过调查公共管理者与民选官员对公民在服务质量改善过程中的作用的看法之间的差异,来解释这种抵制的一部分,从而对此研究做出贡献。设计/方法/方法-于2010年5月和6月对意大利城镇的一个样本进行了邮件调查。总共返回了102份问卷(政治家59份,公共管理人员43份),然后通过t检验和回归。调查结果-调查结果支持在公共管理人员和当选官员的态度之间存在统计上的重大差异。在三个主要问题上存在差异:公民作为提高公共服务质量的投入来源的相对重要性,公民参与的目标以及公民的偏好结构。研究局限性/含义-结果可能受到特定研究环境(意大利地方政府)中新公共管理发展程度的影响。实际意义-公民参与对市政决策过程的作用,时机和贡献的正规化可能有助于减轻上述二元论。建立良好的文化背景并在整个组织(从高层到一线员工)中分享以公民为本的愿景是至关重要的。原创性/价值-本文首次提出,将公民参与质量改进过程的这些阻力可能是由于管理者和当选官员的观点之间的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号