...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging: JMRI >Feasibility study of exploring a T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MR approach for brain perfusion imaging
【24h】

Feasibility study of exploring a T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MR approach for brain perfusion imaging

机译:探索T1加权动态对比增强MR方法进行脑灌注成像的可行性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To investigate the feasibility of T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI for the measurement of brain perfusion. Materials and Methods: Dynamic imaging was performed on a 3.0 Tesla (T) MR scanner by using a rapid spoiled-GRE protocol. T1 measurement with driven equilibrium single pulse observation of T1 (DESPOT1) was used to convert the MR signal to tracer concentration. Cerebral perfusion maps were obtained by using an improved gamma-variate model in 10 subjects and compared with those with arterial spin label (ASL) approach. Results: The cerebral blood volume (CBV) values were calculated as 4.74 ± 1.09 and 2.29 ± 0.58 mL/100 g in gray matter (GM) and whiter matter (WM), respectively. Mean transit time (MTT) values were 6.15 ± 0.59 s in GM and 6.96 ± 0.79 s in WM. The DCE values for GM/WM cerebral blood flow (CBF) were measured as 53.41 ± 9.23 / 25.78 ± 8.91 mL/100 g/min, versus ASL values of 49.05 ± 10.81 / 23.00 ± 5.89 mL/100 g/min for GW/WM. Bland-Altman plot revealed a small difference of CBF between two approaches (mean bias = 3.83 mL/100 g/min, SD = 11.29). There were 6 pairs of samples (5%, 6/120) beyond the 95% limits of agreement. The correlation plots showed that the slop of Y (CBFDCE) versus X intercept (CBFASL) is 0.95 with the intercept of 4.53 mL/100 g/min (r = 0.74; P 0.05). Conclusion: It is feasible to evaluate the cerebral perfusion by using T1-weighted DCE-MRI with the improved kinetic model.
机译:目的:探讨T1加权动态对比增强(DCE)MRI在测量脑灌注方面的可行性。材料和方法:通过使用快速损坏的GRE协议在3.0 Tesla(T)MR扫描仪上进行动态成像。使用驱动平衡T1的单脉冲观测(DESPOT1)进行T1测量,将MR信号转换为示踪剂浓度。通过使用改进的伽玛变量模型在10位受试者中获得脑灌注图,并将其与使用动脉自旋标记(ASL)方法的受试者进行比较。结果:脑血容量(CBV)值分别以灰质(GM)和白质(WM)计算为4.74±1.09和2.29±0.58 mL / 100 g。 GM的平均渡越时间(MTT)值为6.15±0.59 s,WM的平均渡越时间(MTT)值为6.96±0.79 s。 GM / WM脑血流量(CBF)的DCE值测量为53.41±9.23 / 25.78±8.91 mL / 100 g / min,而GW /的ASL值为49.05±10.81 / 23.00±5.89 mL / 100 g / min WM。 Bland-Altman图显示两种方法之间的CBF差异很小(平均偏差= 3.83 mL / 100 g / min,SD = 11.29)。超过协议规定的95%限制的样本有6对(5%,6/120)。相关图显示,Y(CBFDCE)与X截距(CBFASL)的斜率是0.95,截距为4.53 mL / 100 g / min(r = 0.74; P <0.05)。结论:采用改进的动力学模型,采用T1加权DCE-MRI评估脑灌注是可行的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号