首页> 外文期刊>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging: JMRI >Effect of PRESS and STEAM sequences on magnetic resonance spectroscopic liver fat quantification.
【24h】

Effect of PRESS and STEAM sequences on magnetic resonance spectroscopic liver fat quantification.

机译:PRESS和STEAM序列对磁共振波谱肝脂肪定量的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare PRESS and STEAM MR spectroscopy for assessment of liver fat in human subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-voxel (20 x 20 x 20 mm) PRESS and STEAM spectra were obtained at 1.5T in 49 human subjects with known or suspected fatty liver disease. PRESS and STEAM sequences were obtained with fixed TR (1500 msec) and different TE (five PRESS spectra between TE 30-70 msec, five STEAM spectra between TE 20-60 msec). Spectra were quantified and T2 and T2-corrected peak area were calculated by different techniques. The values were compared for PRESS and STEAM. RESULTS: Water T2 values from PRESS and STEAM were not significantly different (P = 0.33). Fat peak T2s were 25%-50% shorter on PRESS than on STEAM (P < 0.02 for all comparisons) and there was no correlation between T2s of individual peaks. PRESS systematically overestimated the relative fat peak areas (by 7%-263%) compared to STEAM (P < 0.005 for all comparisons). The peak area given by PRESS was more dependent on the T2-correction technique than STEAM. CONCLUSION: Measured liver fat depends on the MRS sequence used. Compared to STEAM, PRESS underestimates T2 values of fat, overestimates fat fraction, and provides a less consistent fat fraction estimate, probably due to J coupling effects.
机译:目的:比较压力和蒸汽磁共振波谱法评估人类受试者的肝脂肪。材料与方法:在49例已知或怀疑患有脂肪肝的人类受试者中,在1.5T下获得了单素体(20 x 20 x 20 mm)的PRESS和STEAM光谱。在固定TR(1500毫秒)和不同TE的条件下获得PRESS和STEAM序列(TE 30-70毫秒之间有5个PRESS光谱,TE 20-60毫秒之间有5个STEAM光谱)。定量光谱,并通过不同技术计算T2和T2校正的峰面积。比较压力和蒸汽的值。结果:PRESS和STEAM的水T2值无显着差异(P = 0.33)。 PRESS上的脂肪峰T2比STEAM短25%-50%(所有比较的P <0.02),各个峰的T2之间没有相关性。与STEAM相比,PRESS系统地高估了相对脂肪峰面积(7%-263%)(所有比较的P <0.005)。 PRESS给出的峰面积比STEAM更依赖于T2校正技术。结论:测得的肝脂肪取决于所用的MRS序列。与STEAM相比,PRESS可能低估了脂肪的T2值,高估了脂肪分数,并提供了不太一致的脂肪分数估计值,这可能是由于J耦合效应所致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号