首页> 外文期刊>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging: JMRI >Reliability of two techniques for assessing cerebral iron deposits with structural magnetic resonance imaging.
【24h】

Reliability of two techniques for assessing cerebral iron deposits with structural magnetic resonance imaging.

机译:两种利用结构磁共振成像评估脑铁沉积物的技术的可靠性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PURPOSE: To test the reliability of two computational methods for segmenting cerebral iron deposits (IDs) in the aging brain, given that its measurement in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is challenging due to the similar effect produced by other minerals, especially calcium, on T2*-weighted sequences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: T1-, T2*-weighted, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MR brain images obtained at 1.5T from 70 subjects in their early 70s who displayed a wide range of brain IDs were analyzed. The first segmentation method used a multispectral approach based on the fusion of two or more structural sequences registered and mapped in the red/green color space followed by Minimum Variance Quantization. The second method employed a combined thresholding, size and shape analysis using T2*-weighted images augmented with visual information from T1-weighted data. RESULTS: Both segmentation techniques had high intra- and interobserver agreement (95% confidence interval [CI] = +/- 57 voxels in a range from 0 to 1800), which decreased in subjects with significant microbleeds and/or IDs. However, the thresholding method was more observer dependent in identifying microbleeds and IDs boundaries than the multispectral approach. CONCLUSION: Both techniques proved to be in agreement and have good intra- and interobserver reliability. However, they have limitations, specifically with regard to automation and observer independence, so further work is required to develop fully user-independent methods of identifying cerebral IDs.
机译:目的:为了测试用于区分衰老的大脑中的脑铁沉积物(ID)的两种计算方法的可靠性,鉴于其在磁共振成像(MRI)中的测量由于其他矿物质(尤其是钙)产生的相似作用而具有挑战性,因此具有挑战性T2 *加权序列。材料与方法:分析了T1,T2 *加权和液体衰减倒置恢复(FLAIR)MR脑部图像,这些图像在1.5T时从70年代早期的70名受试者中获得,这些受试者表现出广泛的大脑ID。第一种分割方法使用多光谱方法,该方法基于在红色/绿色空间中注册和映射的两个或多个结构序列的融合,然后进行最小方差量化。第二种方法采用组合的阈值,大小和形状分析,使用T2 *加权图像增强了来自T1加权数据的视觉信息。结果:两种分割技术均具有较高的观察者内和观察者间一致性(95%置信区间[CI] = +/- 57体素,范围从0到1800),在具有明显微出血和/或ID的受试者中下降。但是,与多光谱方法相比,阈值方法在观察微出血和ID边界方面更依赖观察者。结论:两种技术被证明是一致的,并且在观察者内和观察者间具有良好的可靠性。但是,它们具有局限性,特别是在自动化和观察者独立性方面,因此需要进一步的工作来开发完全独立于用户的识别大脑ID的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号