首页> 外文期刊>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging: JMRI >Automatic identification of the left ventricle in cardiac cine-MR images: dual-contrast cluster analysis and scout-geometry approaches.
【24h】

Automatic identification of the left ventricle in cardiac cine-MR images: dual-contrast cluster analysis and scout-geometry approaches.

机译:自动识别心脏电影-MR图像中的左心室:双对比聚类分析和侦察几何方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate the technical feasibility of two approaches--dual-contrast (DC) cluster analysis, and scout geometry (SG)--for automatic identification of the left ventricular (LV) cavity in short-axis (SA) cine-MR images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The DC algorithm uses Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) cluster analysis of SA images from a black-blood double-inversion recovery turbo spin-echo (dual IR TSE) sequence, and bright-blood images from a steady-state free precession (SSFP) sequence. The SG algorithm employs geometric information from scout views (i.e., vertical long-axis (VLA) and four-chamber (4CH) views). Both algorithms incorporate additional geometric continuity constraints along with LV region segmentation to identify the LV. The performance of both algorithms was compared on images of eight healthy volunteers, and the SG algorithm was further evaluated on images of 13 clinical patients. RESULTS: The DC algorithm identified the LV in 89% (72/75 at end-diastole (ED) and 47/59 at end-systole (ES)) of the images from healthy volunteers, compared to 98% (74/75 at ED and 57/59 at ES) by the SG algorithm. Both methods are robust against interslice signal variations and misalignment. The DC method suffers from misregistration between the dual IR TSE and SSFP images near the apex at ES. The SG method identified the LV in 91% (112/122 at ED and 91/102 at ES) of the images from clinical patients. CONCLUSION: The SG method requires no additional scan, is robust and accurate, and performs better than the DC method for automatic identification of the LV.
机译:目的:评估两种方法的技术可行性–双对比(DC)聚类分析和侦察几何(SG)–用于自动识别短轴(SA)电影MR中的左心室(LV)腔图片。材料与方法:DC算法使用模糊C均值(FCM)聚类分析来自黑血双反恢复涡轮自旋回波(双IR TSE)序列的SA图像和来自稳态的亮血图像自由进动(SSFP)序列。 SG算法采用侦查视图(即垂直长轴(VLA)和四腔(4CH)视图)中的几何信息。两种算法都结合了附加的几何连续性约束以及LV区域分割,以识别LV。比较了两种算法在8位健康志愿者的图像上的性能,并在13位临床患者的图像上进一步评估了SG算法。结果:DC算法从健康志愿者中识别出图像的左心室占89%(舒张末期(ED)为72/75,收缩期末期(ES)为47/59),相比之下98%(LV / 74/75) ED和ES中的57/59)。两种方法均能抵抗层间信号变化和未对准。 DC方法在ES顶点附近的双IR TSE和SSFP图像之间存在配准错误。 SG方法在临床患者图像的91%(ED为112/122,ES为91/102)中确定了LV。结论:SG方法不需要额外的扫描,鲁棒且准确,并且比DC方法能够更好地自动识别LV。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号