...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Avian Biology >Do museum specimens accurately represent wild birds? A case study of carotenoid, melanin, and structural colours in long-tailed manakins Chiroxiphia linearis
【24h】

Do museum specimens accurately represent wild birds? A case study of carotenoid, melanin, and structural colours in long-tailed manakins Chiroxiphia linearis

机译:博物馆标本能准确代表野鸟吗?长尾山柑类胡萝卜素类胡萝卜素,黑色素和结构色的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Museum specimens continue to be an invaluable resource for taxonomic, systematic, and comparative studies, and are increasingly relied upon for novel research purposes. Evaluating variation in the colour of avian study skins forms the basis for a broad range of research questions, yet few studies have investigated whether the plumage colouration of museum specimens accurately reflects colouration in wild birds. In this study, we use reflectance spectrometry to compare the plumage reflectance of avian museum skins and wild birds. We use long-tailed manakins Chiroxiphia linearis, to investigate these potential differences in colour. Long-tailed manakins are ideal for this type of study as their colourful plumage patches result from three primary plumage colouration mechanisms found in birds: melanin pigmentation, carotenoid pigmentation, and structural colouration. These features of their plumage allowed us to independently assess variation in each plumage colouration mechanism. Reflectance spectra obtained from museum specimens were very similar to those obtained from wild birds, and the colouration of specimens was usually well within the range of variation observed in wild birds. As such, museum specimens can accurately represent the colouration of wild birds. Nevertheless, we found significant differences in colouration between museum skins and wild birds. We documented differences in brightness, hue, saturation, and chroma, although the direction and magnitude of these differences varied by mechanism of colouration. Multivariate analyses revealed that the age of museum specimens and the time of year at which they were collected contributed to some of these differences. We discuss potential proximate causes of these changes in colour, many of which apply to both museum specimens and wild birds, and identify the types of studies that are likely to be most sensitive to these changes.
机译:博物馆标本仍然是分类,系统和比较研究的宝贵资源,并且越来越多地被用于新的研究目的。评估禽类研究用皮颜色的变化是广泛研究问题的基础,但很少有研究调查博物馆标本的羽毛颜色是否能准确反映野生鸟类的颜色。在这项研究中,我们使用反射光谱法比较了鸟类博物馆的皮和野生鸟类的羽毛反射率。我们使用长尾manakins线性Chiroxiphia,以调查这些潜在的颜色差异。长尾型柑桔是此类研究的理想选择,因为它们的彩色羽毛斑块来自鸟类发现的三种主要羽毛着色机制:黑色素着色,类胡萝卜素着色和结构着色。羽毛的这些特征使我们能够独立评估每种羽毛着色机制的变化。从博物馆标本获得的反射光谱与从野生鸟类获得的反射光谱非常相似,并且标本的颜色通常很好地在野生鸟类观察到的变化范围内。这样,博物馆标本可以准确地代表野鸟的颜色。尽管如此,我们发现博物馆的皮和野鸟在颜色上存在显着差异。我们记录了亮度,色相,饱和度和色度方面的差异,尽管这些差异的方向和大小因着色机制而异。多变量分析表明,博物馆标本的年龄和收集它们的时间是造成这些差异的原因之一。我们讨论了这些颜色变化的潜在直接原因,其中许多原因都适用于博物馆标本和野生鸟类,并确定可能对这些变化最敏感的研究类型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号