...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Macromolecular Science. Physics >Computational-Based Approach for Predicting Porosity of Electrospun Nanofiber Mats Using Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Network Methods
【24h】

Computational-Based Approach for Predicting Porosity of Electrospun Nanofiber Mats Using Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Network Methods

机译:基于计算的响应面方法和人工神经网络方法预测电纺纳米纤维毡的孔隙率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Comparative studies between response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN) methods to find the effects of electrospinning parameters on the porosity of nanofiber mats is described. The four important electrospinning parameters studied included solution concentration (wt. %), applied voltage (kV), spinning distance (cm) and volume flow rate (mL/h). It was found that the applied voltage and solution concentration are the two critical parameters affecting the porosity of the nanofiber mats. The two approaches were compared for their modeling and optimization capabilities with the modeling capability of RSM showing superiority over ANN, having comparatively lower values of errors. The mean relative error for the RSM and ANN models were 1.97% and 2.62% and the root mean square errors (RMSE) were 1.50 and 1.95, respectively. The superiority of the RSM-based approach is due to its high prediction accuracy and the ability to compute the combined effects of the electrospinning factors on the porosity of the nanofiber mats.
机译:描述了响应表面方法(RSM)和人工神经网络(ANN)方法之间的比较研究,以发现电纺丝参数对纳米纤维垫的孔隙率的影响。研究的四个重要的电纺丝参数包括溶液浓度(重量%),施加电压(kV),纺丝距离(cm)和体积流量(mL / h)。发现施加的电压和溶液浓度是影响纳米纤维垫的孔隙率的两个关键参数。对这两种方法的建模和优化能力进行了比较,其中RSM的建模能力显示出优于ANN的优势,并且具有相对较低的误差值。 RSM和ANN模型的平均相对误差分别为1.97%和2.62%,均方根误差(RMSE)分别为1.50和1.95。基于RSM的方法的优越性是由于其较高的预测精度以及能够计算静电纺丝因子对纳米纤维毡的孔隙率的综合影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号