首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical ethics >Can artificial parthenogenesis sidestep ethical pitfalls in human therapeutic cloning? An historical perspective.
【24h】

Can artificial parthenogenesis sidestep ethical pitfalls in human therapeutic cloning? An historical perspective.

机译:人工孤雌生殖能否避免人类治疗性克隆中的道德陷阱?历史的观点。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of regenerative medicine is to reconstruct tissue that has been lost or pathologically altered. Therapeutic cloning seems to offer a method of achieving this aim; however, the ethical debate surrounding human therapeutic cloning is highly controversial. Artificial parthenogenesis-obtaining embryos from unfertilised eggs-seems to offer a way to sidestep these ethical pitfalls. Jacques Loeb (1859-1924), the founding father of artificial parthenogenesis, faced negative public opinion when he published his research in 1899. His research, the public's response to his findings, and his ethical foundations serve as an historical argument both for the communication of science and compromise in biological research.
机译:再生医学的目的是重建已经丢失或病理改变的组织。治疗性克隆似乎为实现这一目标提供了一种方法。但是,围绕人类治疗性克隆的伦理学辩论引起了极大争议。从未受精卵中获得人工孤雌生殖的胚胎似乎为避开这些道德陷阱提供了一种方法。人工孤雌生殖的创始者雅克·勒布(Jacques Loeb(1859-1924))在1899年发表研究报告时,遭到了公众的负面评价。科学和生物研究的折衷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号