...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical ethics >Opinions of private medical practitioners in Bloemfontein, South Africa, regarding euthanasia of terminally ill patients.
【24h】

Opinions of private medical practitioners in Bloemfontein, South Africa, regarding euthanasia of terminally ill patients.

机译:南非布隆方丹的私人执业医生关于绝症患者的安乐死的意见。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The aim of this study was to determine the opinions of private medical practitioners in Bloemfontein, South Africa, regarding euthanasia of terminally ill patients. This descriptive study was performed amongst a simple random sample of 100 of 230 private medical practitioners in Bloemfontein. Information was obtained through anonymous self-administered questionnaires. Written informed consent was obtained. 68 of the doctors selected completed the questionnaire. Only three refused participation because they were opposed to euthanasia. Respondents were mainly male (74.2%), married (91.9%) and Afrikaans-speaking (91.9%). More were specialists (53.2%) than general practitioners (46.8%). A smaller percentage (35.5%) would never consider euthanasia for themselves compared to for their patients (46.8%). The decision should be made by the patient (50%), the patient's doctor with two colleagues (46.8%), close family (45.2%) or a special committee of specialists in ethics and medicine (37.1%). The majority (46.9%) indicated that euthanasia should be performed by an independent doctor trained in euthanasia, followed by the patient's doctor (30.7%). Notification should mainly be given to a special committee (49.9%). Only 9.8% felt that no notification was necessary. There was strong opposition to prescribing of medication to let the patient die. Withdrawal of essential medical treatment to speed up death was the most acceptable method. Although the responding group was fairly homogeneous, responses varied widely, indicating the complexity of opinions.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定南非布隆方丹的私人执业医生对绝症患者的安乐死的意见。这项描述性研究是在布隆方丹的230位私人医生中随机抽取100位进行的。信息是通过匿名的自我管理问卷获得的。已获得书面知情同意。选定的68位医生填写了问卷。只有三个拒绝参加,因为他们反对安乐死。受访者主要是男性(74.2%),已婚(91.9%)和讲南非荷兰语(91.9%)。专家(53.2%)比全科医生(46.8%)多。与患者(46.8%)相比,较小的百分比(35.5%)永远不会考虑自己实施安乐死。该决定应由患者(50%),患者的医生与两名同事(46.8%),亲属(45.2%)或伦理学和医学专家特别委员会(37.1%)做出。多数(46.9%)的人表示安乐死应由接受过安乐死训练的独立医生进行,其次是患者的医生(30.7%)。通知应主要发送给专门委员会(49.9%)。只有9.8%的人认为没有必要通知。强烈反对开药以使病人死亡。撤离基本药物以加速死亡是最可接受的方法。尽管答复小组相当均一,但答复却相差很大,表明意见的复杂性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号