首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Medical Entomology >Determinants of Male Aedes aegypti and Aedes polynesiensis (Diptera: Culicidae) Response to Sound: Efficacy and Considerations for Use of Sound Traps in the Field
【24h】

Determinants of Male Aedes aegypti and Aedes polynesiensis (Diptera: Culicidae) Response to Sound: Efficacy and Considerations for Use of Sound Traps in the Field

机译:埃及伊蚊和白纹伊蚊(Diptera:Culicidae)对声音响应的决定因素:功效和在田间使用声诱器的注意事项

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Understanding the mating competitiveness of male mosquitoes in field settings is essential to programs relying on the mass release of modified male mosquitoes, yet studies on male ecology have been hampered by the lack of a convenient trapping method.An existing promising method makes use of the innate attraction of males to female flight tones. Here, we present laboratory, greenhouse, and field experiments on the efficacy of sound traps for the collection of Aedes aegypti (L.) and Aedes polynesiensis Marks, and laboratory experiments with Ae. aegypti on the effects of male age, size, and mating status on responsiveness to a range of frequencies. Age and mating status influenced the overall responsiveness to sound, whereas male size did not. Therewere no interactions between these factors and sound frequency. A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention miniature light trap modified to produce a tone of 465 Hz collected 76.2% of Ae. aegypti males in laboratory cages, and 49.7% of males in a greenhouse enclosure. In two sets of experiments in laboratory cages, 50.8 and 46.5% of male Ae. polynesiensis were captured with a trap producing a tone of440 Hz. In the field, CDC miniature light traps or BG-Sentinel traps fitted with a portable speaker producing tones of 440 or 465 Hz captured significantly more male Ae. polynesiensis when placed near a male swarm than did traps that did not produce sound. When the trap was placed at a distance of 16.5 m from the nearest swarm, there was no significant difference in the number of males caught between control and sound-producing traps. The numbers of Ae. aegypti males captured were low under all circumstances in the field.
机译:了解野蚊在野外交配的竞争能力对于依赖于改良型雄蚊大量释放的程序至关重要,但是由于缺乏便利的诱捕方法而阻碍了雄性生态学研究。现有的一种有前途的方法利用了先天性男性对女性飞行音调的吸引力。在这里,我们介绍了利用声诱器收集埃及伊蚊(A.es)和埃及伊蚊(Aedes polynesiensis)标记的捕声器功效的实验室,温室和野外实验,以及使用Ae的实验室实验。埃及on对雄性年龄,大小和交配状况对频率响应的影响。年龄和交配状态影响声音的整体响应能力,而男性大小则没有。这些因素和声频之间没有相互作用。疾病控制与预防中心的微型光阱经过修改,可产生465 Hz的音调,收集到76.2%的Ae。实验室笼子中的埃及埃及雄性,温室围栏中的埃及雄性为49.7%。在实验室笼中进行的两组实验中,雄性Ae占50.8和46.5%。用产生440 Hz音调的陷阱捕获波利尼西亚。在现场,装有便携式扬声器的CDC微型光阱或BG-Sentinel阱产生的440或465 Hz音调捕获了更多的雄性Ae。如果将波尼尼西斯犬放置在雄蜂群附近,则比不发出声音的陷阱要多。将诱捕器放置在距最近的蜂群16.5 m的距离处,在控制诱捕器和发声诱捕器之间捕获的雄性数量没有显着差异。 Ae的数量。在野外所有情况下,被捕获的埃及埃及男性都较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号