...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology: the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association >Intentional swallowing of foreign bodies is a recurrent and costly problem that rarely causes endoscopy complications.
【24h】

Intentional swallowing of foreign bodies is a recurrent and costly problem that rarely causes endoscopy complications.

机译:有意吞咽异物是一个经常发生且代价高昂的问题,很少引起内窥镜并发症。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Guidelines support endoscopic removal of certain gastric foreign bodies (FBs) and all FBs lodged in the esophagus. We studied the poorly understood group of patients who intentionally ingest FBs. METHODS: Cases of intentional ingestion of FBs (n = 305) were identified, retrospectively, from an electronic endoscopy database and followed. Cases occurred among 33 different patients, who underwent endoscopy from October 1, 2001, to July 31, 2009 (39.0 cases/year); 79% were diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder. Financial cost analysis was performed using hospital billing and cost systems. RESULTS: Commonly ingested FBs included pens (23.6%), batteries (9.2%), knives (7.2%), and razor blades (6.9%). Most endoscopic procedures were performed under general anesthesia. FBs were commonly retrieved by snares (58.0%), rat-toothed forceps (14.4%), and nets (11.5%), assisted sometimes by use of overtubes (10.8%), and hoods (4.6%). FB extraction was unsuccessful at the initial endoscopy in only 20 cases; 2 cases eventually required surgical extraction. Minor complications occurred in 11 endoscopies. There were no deaths or perforations. The total estimated costs were Dollars 2,018,073 (Dollars 1,500,627 in hospital costs, Dollars 240,640 in physician fees, and Dollars 276,806 for security services). Costs were significantly higher for inpatients. Major payers were Medicare (48%) and Medicaid (31%). CONCLUSIONS: Intentional FB ingestion occurs among a relatively small number of patients with psychiatric disorders and is costly. Endoscopic retrieval is relatively effective and safe, but often requires general anesthesia. These cases utilize significant hospital and fiscal resources. Attention should be focused on preventing these recurrent and costly episodes.
机译:背景与目的:指南支持在内窥镜下去除某些胃异物(FB)和所有食管中存在的FB。我们研究了故意摄入FBs的患者了解甚少的人群。方法:回顾性地从电子内窥镜数据库中鉴定出有意摄入FBs(n = 305)的病例,并进行随访。从2001年10月1日至2009年7月31日接受内窥镜检查的33例患者中发生了病例(39.0例/年); 79%被诊断出患有精神疾病。使用医院计费和成本系统进行财务成本分析。结果:通常摄入的FB包括笔(23.6%),电池(9.2%),刀(7.2%)和剃须刀(6.9%)。大多数内窥镜检查程序是在全身麻醉下进行的。通常通过网罗(58.0%),鼠齿钳(14.4%)和蚊帐(11.5%)来恢复FB,有时还可以使用外套管(10.8%)和头巾(4.6%)来恢复。只有20例在初次内窥镜检查中FB提取失败。 2例最终需要手术摘除。 11例内镜检查发生了轻微并发症。没有死亡或穿孔。估计费用总额为2,018,073美元(其中,住院费用为1,500,627美元,医师费用为240,640美元,安全服务为276,806美元)。住院病人的费用明显更高。主要付款者是医疗保险(48%)和医疗补助(31%)。结论:有意的FB摄入发生在相对较少的精神病患者中,且成本高昂。内窥镜取回是相对有效和安全的,但通常需要全身麻醉。这些病例需要大量的医院和财政资源。应将注意力集中在预防这些反复发作和代价高昂的发作上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号