首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Materials Science Letters >Scanning tunnelling microscopy study of surface relief with bainite and martensite transformation
【24h】

Scanning tunnelling microscopy study of surface relief with bainite and martensite transformation

机译:贝氏体和马氏体相变的表面起伏扫描隧道显微镜研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although more than half a century has passed since the early work on the morphology of bainite in steel by Robertson in 1929 [1], considerable disagreement [2] still remains as to whether bainite forms by shear or diffusion. Important experimental evidence supporting shear mechanism is the work of Ko and Cottrell [3] in 1952, which showed surface relief during bainite transformation similar to that obtained during martensite transformation, and "found that bainite forms by nucleation and coherent growth". However, Aaronson et al. [4-7] found differences in the two kinds of surface relief, such as the shape of bainite relief is often "tent-like", and of martensite is "N-like", and concluded that bainite formed in a different way from martensite. Bhadeshia [8] gave the difference another explanation, i.e., the "tent-like" bainite surface relief is the result of plastic accommodation of the adjacent austenite by slip, and indeed also of an IPS type. Thus the fine structure of the surface relief is a key point in studying bainite transformation.
机译:尽管自1929年罗伯逊(Robertson)从事钢中贝氏体形态的早期研究以来已经过去了半个多世纪[1],但关于贝氏体是通过剪切还是扩散形成的,仍然存在很多分歧[2]。支持剪切机理的重要实验证据是Ko和Cottrell [3]在1952年的工作,该研究表明贝氏体转变过程中的表面起伏类似于马氏体转变过程中获得的表面起伏,并且“发现贝氏体通过成核和相干生长而形成”。但是,Aaronson等。 [4-7]发现两种表面浮雕的差异,例如贝氏体浮雕的形状通常为“帐篷状”,马氏体为“ N形”,并得出结论,贝氏体的形成方式与马氏体。 Bhadeshia [8]对差异进行了另一种解释,即“帐篷状”贝氏体表面起伏是相邻奥氏体通过滑移而塑性容纳的结果,实际上也是IPS型。因此,表面起伏的精细结构是研究贝氏体相变的关键。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号