...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Quality >Whole-stream response to nitrate loading in three streams draining agricultural landscapes
【24h】

Whole-stream response to nitrate loading in three streams draining agricultural landscapes

机译:三流农业景观排水中全流对硝酸盐负荷的响应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Physical, chemical, hydrologic, and biologic factors affecting nitrate (NO(3)(-)) removal were evaluated in three agricultural streams draining orchard/dairy and row crop settings. Using 3-d "snapshots" during biotically active periods, we estimated reach-level NO(3)(-) sources, NO(3)(-) mass balance, in-stream processing (nitrification, denitrification, and NO(3)(-) uptake), and NO(3)(-) retention potential associated with surface water transport and ground water discharge. Ground water contributed 5 to 11% to stream discharge along the study reaches and 8 to 42% of gross NO(3)(-) input. Streambed processes potentially reduced 45 to 75% of ground water NO(3)(-) before discharge to surface water. In all streams, transient storage was of little importance for surface water NO(3)(-) retention. Estimated nitrification (1.6-4.4 mg N m(-2) h(-1)) and unamended denitrification rates (2.0-16.3 mg N m(-2) h(-1)) in sediment slurries were high relative to pristine streams. Denitrification of NO(3)(-) was largely independent of nitrification because both stream and ground water were sources of NO(3)(-). Unamended denitrification rates extrapolated to the reach-scale accounted for <5% of NO(3)(-) exported from the reaches minimally reducing downstream loads. Nitrate retention as a percentage of gross NO(3)(-) inputs was >30% in an organic-poor, autotrophic stream with the lowest denitrification potentials and highest benthic chlorophyll a, photosynthesis/respiration ratio, pH, dissolved oxygen, and diurnal NO(3)(-) variation. Biotic processing potentially removed 75% of ground water NO(3)(-) at this site, suggesting an important role for photosynthetic assimilation of ground water NO(3)(-) relative to subsurface denitrification as water passed directly through benthic diatom beds.
机译:影响硝酸盐(NO(3)(-))去除的物理,化学,水文和生物因素在排水果园/奶牛场和大田作物设置的三种农业流中进行了评估。在生物活跃时期使用3-d“快照”,我们估算了NO(3)(-)来源,NO(3)(-)质量平衡,流中处理(硝化,反硝化和NO(3))的水平(-)吸收)和与地表水运输和地下水排放相关的NO(3)(-)保留潜力。在研究期间,地下水贡献了5至11%的水流,占总NO(3)(-)投入的8至42%。流化床工艺在排放到地表水之前,可能会减少45%至75%的地下水NO(3)(-)。在所有流中,瞬时存储对于地表水NO(3)(-)的保留意义不大。相对于原始流,泥浆中的估计硝化(1.6-4.4 mg N m(-2)h(-1))和未修正的反硝化速率(2.0-16.3 mg N m(-2)h(-1))高。 NO(3)(-)的反硝化在很大程度上与硝化作用无关,因为溪流和地下水都是NO(3)(-)的来源。外推到覆盖范围的未修改反硝化率占从覆盖范围输出的NO(3)(-)的<5%,最小程度地减少了下游负荷。在具有低反硝化潜力和最高底栖叶绿素a,光合作用/呼吸比,pH,溶解氧和昼夜的有机贫瘠,自养流中,硝酸盐截留量占总NO(3)(-)的百分比> 30% NO(3)(-)变化。生物处理可能会在该位置去除75%的地下水NO(3)(-),这表明相对于地下反硝化作用,地下水NO(3)(-)的光合吸收具有重要作用,因为水直接通过底栖硅藻床。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号