首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Quality >Inputs and losses by surface runoff and subsurface leaching for pastures managed by continuous or rotational stocking.
【24h】

Inputs and losses by surface runoff and subsurface leaching for pastures managed by continuous or rotational stocking.

机译:通过连续或轮作放牧管理的牧场的地表径流和地下淋溶的投入和损失。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Pasture management practices can affect forage quality and production, animal health and production, and surface and groundwater quality. In a 5-yr study conducted at the North Appalachian Experimental Watershed near Coshocton, Ohio, we compared the effects of two contrasting grazing methods on surface and subsurface water quantity and quality. Four pastures, each including a small, instrumented watershed (0.51-1.09 ha) for surface runoff measurements and a developed spring for subsurface flow collection, received 112 kg N ha(-1) yr(-1) and were grazed at similar stocking rates (1.8-1.9 cows ha(-1)). Two pastures were continuously stocked; two were subdivided so that they were grazed with frequent rotational stocking (5-6 times weekly). In the preceding 5 yr, these pastures received 112 kg N ha(-1) yr(-1) after several years of 0 N fertilizer and were grazed with weekly rotational stocking. Surface runoff losses of N were minimal. During these two periods, some years had precipitation up to 50% greater than the long-term average, which increased subsurface flow and NO(3)-N transport. Average annual NO(3)-N transported in subsurface flow from the four watersheds during the two 5-yr periods ranged from 11.3 to 22.7 kg N ha(-1), which was similar to or less than the mineral-N received in precipitation. Flow and transport variations were greater among seasons than among watersheds. Flow-weighted seasonal NO(3)-N concentrations in subsurface flow did not exceed 7 mg L(-1). Variations in NO(3)-N leached from pastures were primarily due to variable precipitation rather than the effects of continuous, weekly rotational, or frequent rotational stocking practices. This suggests that there was no difference among these grazing practices in terms of NO(3)-N leaching. Copyright Copyright by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc.
机译:牧场管理实践会影响草料质量和产量,动物健康和产量以及地表水和地下水质量。在俄亥俄州Coshocton附近的北阿巴拉契亚实验流域进行的为期5年的研究中,我们比较了两种对比放牧方法对地表水和地下水的数量和质量的影响。四个牧场分别收到一个112千克N ha(-1)yr(-1)的草场,以相同的放养量放牧,每个牧场包括一个用于测量地表径流量的小型仪器化集水区(0.51-1.09公顷)和用于收集地下流量的发达弹簧。 (1.8-1.9头牛ha(-1))。连续放养了两个牧场;将其细分为两个,以便经常轮流放牧(每周5-6次)。在之前的5年中,这些草场在使用了0 N肥料的几年后收到了112 kg N ha(-1)yr(-1),并每周放牧放牧。 N的地表径流损失最小。在这两个时期中,有些年份的降水量比长期平均值高出50%,这增加了地下流量和NO(3)-N的迁移。在两个五年期中,从四个集水区转移到地下流中的年平均NO(3)-N范围为11.3至22.7 kg N ha(-1),与降水中收到的矿物N相似或更少。 。季节之间的流量和运输变化大于分水岭之间的变化。地下流中的流量加权季节性NO(3)-N浓度不超过7 mg L(-1)。从牧场中浸出的NO(3)-N的变化主要是由于降水变化,而不是连续,每周轮换或频繁轮换进行的。这表明就NO(3)-N淋洗而言,这些放牧方法之间没有差异。版权美国农艺学会,美国作物科学学会和美国土壤科学学会版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号