首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Korean Forestry Society >Effect of Silvicultural Treatments on Carbon Storage of Northern Hardwood Forests
【24h】

Effect of Silvicultural Treatments on Carbon Storage of Northern Hardwood Forests

机译:营林措施对北方阔叶林碳储量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study is designed to provide forest managers and landowners with tools to estimate the effect of forest management on carbon storage, investigating living tree biomass, detritus, and harvested wood products as variables. Thinning, selection cutting, and uncutting were applied to the three different forest types in New York, USA. Carbon storage of the original stands was 90, 56, and 101 Mg ha~(-1) at the Allegheny hardwood forest, Northern hardwood forest, and Oak - black cherry forest, respectively. Among treatments, uncutting generally stored the greatest amount carbon. However, the rate of carbon storage was the smallest at the uncut treatment in all the sites. The 50% thinning, 50% selection, and 50% thinning treatments were the highest rateof carbon storage at the Allegheny hardwood forest, Northern hardwood forest, and Oak - cherry forest, respectively. In this study, only short term was applied to simulate carbon sequestration after silvicultural treatment. So, more research is needed to determine whether any silvicultural treatment can store significantly more carbon than no treatment over the long term.
机译:这项研究旨在为森林管理者和土地所有者提供工具,以评估森林管理对碳储存的影响,调查活树生物量,碎屑和收获的木材产品作为变量。在美国纽约,对三种不同的森林类型进行了间伐,选择砍伐和未砍伐。在Allegheny硬木森林,北部硬木森林和Oak-黑樱桃森林中,原始林的碳储量分别为90、56和101 Mg ha〜(-1)。在各种处理中,未切割的碳通常存储最多。然而,在所有地点,未切割处理的碳储存速率最小。 50%间伐,50%选择和50%间伐处理分别是Allegheny硬木森林,北部硬木森林和Oak-cherry森林的最高碳储存率。在这项研究中,仅短期应用了模拟造林处理后的固碳。因此,需要更多的研究来确定长期而言,任何造林方法是否可以比不进行任何处理存储更多的碳。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号