首页> 外文期刊>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics: JMPT >Reliability and measurement error of 3-dimensional regional lumbar motion measures: A systematic review
【24h】

Reliability and measurement error of 3-dimensional regional lumbar motion measures: A systematic review

机译:三维区域腰椎运动测量的可靠性和测量误差:系统综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on reproducibility (reliability and/or measurement error) of 3-dimensional (3D) regional lumbar motion measurement systems. Methods: Electronic searches were performed in PubMed, Cumulative Index of the Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, and Mantis databases. To be included, original studies had to report on the reproducibility of a 3D computerized regional lumbar spinal motion analysis system in human subjects. A detailed checklist was developed based on guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies, the standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy, and quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies and used for data extraction and quality assessment. The checklist consisted of descriptive items divided into 4 domains: study population, testing circumstances, equipment, and data analysis and presentation. The descriptive items were used as foundation for the quality assessment reflecting the reporting level of the included articles. Results: A total of 15 articles were included in this study. We found incomplete reporting in 1 or more domains in all articles. A varying amount of measurement error was reported in 8 of the 15 articles. Because of incomplete reporting, these reliability and measurement error estimates are difficult to interpret. Conclusions: The current literature on the reliability and measurement error of measures created by regional 3D spinal instruments contains uncertainties especially in relevant clinical populations. There is uncertainty with respect to the degree that repeated measurements by 3D regional spinal motion instruments are reproducible. However, limited to the studies where reliability estimates were provided, most instruments used under standardized conditions may be considered reliable enough to be used for research purposes on the group level, but it is uncertain if they can be used on the individual patient level. ? 2012 National University of Health Sciences.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是系统地回顾有关3维(3D)区域腰椎运动测量系统的再现性(可靠性和/或测量误差)的文献。方法:在PubMed,《护理和相关健康文献的累积索引》,Embase和Mantis数据库中进行电子搜索。包括在内,原始研究必须报告3D计算机化的区域腰椎运动分析系统在人类受试者中的可重复性。根据报告可靠性和一致性研究的指南,报告诊断准确性的标准以及诊断准确性研究的质量评估,制定了详细的清单,并用于数据提取和质量评估。该清单由描述性项目组成,分为四个领域:研究人群,测试环境,设备以及数据分析和表示。描述性项目被用作质量评估的基础,反映了所包含文章的报告水平。结果:共有15篇文章被纳入了这项研究。我们在所有文章中发现1个或多个域中的报告不完整。 15篇文章中有8篇报道了不同程度的测量误差。由于报告不完整,这些可靠性和测量误差估计值难以解释。结论:当前有关区域3D脊柱器械所产生测量的可靠性和测量误差的文献存在不确定性,尤其是在相关的临床人群中。关于通过3D区域脊柱运动仪器重复测量的可重复性的程度存在不确定性。但是,仅限于提供可靠性评估的研究,在标准化条件下使用的大多数仪器可能被认为足够可靠,可以用于团体水平的研究目的,但是不确定是否可以在个体患者水平上使用它们。 ? 2012国立卫生科学大学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号