首页> 外文期刊>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics: JMPT >Cost of care for common back pain conditions initiated with chiropractic doctor vs medical doctor/doctor of osteopathy as first physician: experience of one Tennessee-based general health insurer.
【24h】

Cost of care for common back pain conditions initiated with chiropractic doctor vs medical doctor/doctor of osteopathy as first physician: experience of one Tennessee-based general health insurer.

机译:由脊椎治疗医生与医学博士/整骨病医生作为第一位医生开始的常见背痛病症的护理费用:一家位于田纳西州的综合健康保险公司的经验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to determine if there are differences in the cost of low back pain care when a patient is able to choose a course of treatment with a medical doctor (MD) versus a doctor of chiropractic (DC), given that his/her insurance provides equal access to both provider types. METHODS: A retrospective claims analysis was performed on Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tennessee's intermediate and large group fully insured population between October 1, 2004 and September 30, 2006. The insured study population had open access to MDs and DCs through self-referral without any limit to the number of visits or differences in co-pays to these 2 provider types. Our analysis was based on episodes of care for low back pain. An episode was defined as all reimbursed care delivered between the first and the last encounter with a health care provider for low back pain. A 60 day window without an encounter was treated as a new episode. We compared paid claims and risk adjusted costs between episodes of care initiated with an MD with those initiated with a DC. RESULTS: Paid costs for episodes of care initiated with a DC were almost 40% less than episodes initiated with an MD. Even after risk adjusting each patient's costs, we found that episodes of care initiated with a DC were 20% less expensive than episodes initiated with an MD. CONCLUSIONS: Beneficiaries in our sampling frame had lower overall episode costs for treatment of low back pain if they initiated care with a DC, when compared to those who initiated care with an MD.
机译:目的:本研究的主要目的是确定当患者能够选择由内科医生(MD)与脊骨科医生(DC)治疗的疗程时,腰痛护理费用是否存在差异,鉴于他/她的保险可以平等地使用两种提供者类型。方法:在2004年10月1日至2006年9月30日期间,对田纳西州中,大型团体完全保险人群的Blue Cross Blue Shield进行了回顾性索赔分析。被保险的研究人群可以通过自我推荐而免费获得MD和DC限制这两种提供商类型的访问次数或共付额差异。我们的分析基于对下背部疼痛的护理发作。发作定义为在与医护人员第一次接触和最后一次接触之间因腰痛而提供的所有有偿护理。 60天无遭遇的窗口被视为新事件。我们将MD发起的护理与DC发起的护理之间的已付费索赔和风险调整成本进行了比较。结果:由DC发起的护理事件的付费成本比由MD发起的护理事件低40%。即使在风险调整每个患者的费用后,我们发现由DC发起的护理费用也比由MD发起的护理费用低20%。结论:与通过MD进行护理的患者相比,如果采用DC进行护理,则在我们的抽样框架中,受益人的下背痛总体治疗费用较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号