首页> 外文期刊>Journal of managed care pharmacy : >Analysis of nonformulary use of PPIs and excess drug cost in a Veterans Affairs population.
【24h】

Analysis of nonformulary use of PPIs and excess drug cost in a Veterans Affairs population.

机译:对退伍军人事务人群中非常规使用PPI和过量药物成本的分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system, a formulary-based approach without beneficiary cost-share incentives is used to limit the pharmacy cost of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). However, the effectiveness of this approach in reducing the cost of PPIs is unknown.To (a) compare cost differences between the formulary PPI (generic omeprazole) and nonformulary PPIs and (b) evaluate reasons for nonformulary PPI use in order to identify opportunities to increase formulary drug use and discourage unnecessary use of nonformulary PPIs.A list of patients with receipt of PPIs from July 1, 2008, through June 30, 2009, was obtained from the Loma Linda VA Healthcare System pharmacy. Subjects with receipt of at least 120 units (capsules or tablets) of any PPI in the study period were considered long-term users. Demographic information was collected. Pharmacy consult records were reviewed to identify reasons for nonformulary use and dosing regimen of the formulary PPI prior to the switch. Cost analysis was done based on the VA contract prices for the drugs at the time of the study.Of 58,605 unique patients seen in this VA health care system in the 12-month period from July 1, 2008, through June 30, 2009, 13,713 (23.4%) received a PPI, and of these, 10,483 (76.4%) received at least 120 PPI units and were defined as long-term users. Of the long-term users, 9,462 (90.3%) were on the formulary PPI generic omeprazole, and 1,021 were nonformulary PPI users. Use of nonformulary PPIs (esomeprazole, pantoprazole, lansoprazole, rabeprazole) accounted for 10.5% of the PPI units and 9.7% of the users but 57.3% of total PPI cost. This pattern resulted in $570,263 in excess spending (i.e., $570,263 would have been saved in the study period if the nonformulary PPI users had used the formulary drug). The most common reason for nonformulary long-term PPI use was persistent symptoms (n=901, 88.2%). Adverse reaction was cited by 111 (10.9%) of nonformulary PPI users, 33.3% (n=37) of whom reported diarrhea. Of those who switched to a nonformulary PPI due to persistent symptoms, 363 (40.3%) were on once-daily dosing prior to the switch; 379 (42.1%) were on twice-daily dosing; and 159 (17.6%) were transfers from other places in which prior dosing information was not available in the hospital pharmacy records.One-year PPI use prevalence was 23% in this VA population, and long-term use prevalence was 18%. Nonformulary PPI use accounted for 10.5% of the PPI units and 9.7% of the users but 57.3% of total PPI drug cost. Opportunities to reduce nonformulary PPI use in order to reduce overall expenditures on PPIs include verification of optimal formulary PPI use, titration to twice-daily dosing, and confirmation of adverse reaction as being attributable to PPI use.
机译:在退伍军人事务(VA)卫生保健系统中,采用无受益成本分担激励措施的基于处方的方法来限制质子泵抑制剂(PPI)的药房成本。但是,这种方法在降低PPI成本方面的有效性尚不明确。(a)比较配方PPI(通用奥美拉唑)和非常规PPI之间的成本差异,以及(b)评估使用非常规PPI的原因以发现机会从2008年7月1日至2009年6月30日,收到LPI Linda VA Healthcare System药房的患者收到了PPI清单。在研究期间收到至少120单位(胶囊或片剂)任何PPI的受试者被视为长期使用者。收集了人口统计信息。在转换之前,对药房咨询记录进行了审查,以确定非常规使用原因和处方PPI的给药方案。费用分析是根据研究时药物的VA合同价格进行的.2008年7月1日至2009年6月30日的12个月中,在该VA保健系统中发现的58,605名独特患者中,有13,713例(23.4%)获得了PPI,其中10,483(76.4%)获得了至少120个PPI单位,并被定义为长期用户。在长期用户中,有9,462(90.3%)位使用PPI仿制药奥美拉唑,另有1,021位非常规PPI用户。非正规PPI(埃索美拉唑,pan托拉唑,兰索拉唑,雷贝拉唑)的使用占PPI单位的10.5%和用户的9.7%,但占PPI总成本的57.3%。这种模式导致了570,263美元的超额支出(即,如果非正规PPI用户使用了处方药,则在研究期间可以节省570,263美元)。长期非常规使用PPI的最常见原因是持续症状(n = 901,88.2%)。非正规PPI使用者中有111名(10.9%)表示不良反应,其中33.3%(n = 37)报告了腹泻。由于持续性症状而改用非常规PPI的患者中,有363(40.3%)人在改用前每天一次。每天两次给药379次(42.1%); 159(17.6%)是从医院药房记录中未提供先前给药信息的其他地方转移而来。该VA人群的一年PPI使用率为23%,长期使用率为18%。非正规PPI的使用量占PPI单位的10.5%和用户的9.7%,但占PPI总药物成本的57.3%。减少非常规PPI的使用以减少PPI的总支出的机会包括验证最佳配方PPI的使用,滴定至每日两次剂量以及确认不良反应归因于PPI的使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号