首页> 外文期刊>Journal of managed care pharmacy : >Cost-Effectiveness of Sibutramine in the LOSE Weight Study: Evaluating the Role of Pharmacologic Weight-Loss Therapy Within a Weight Management Program.
【24h】

Cost-Effectiveness of Sibutramine in the LOSE Weight Study: Evaluating the Role of Pharmacologic Weight-Loss Therapy Within a Weight Management Program.

机译:西布曲明在LOSE体重研究中的成本效果:在体重管理计划中评估药理性减肥治疗的作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

the cost-effectiveness of drug therapy when used in conjunction with a weight management program (WMP) for treatment of obesity. The objective was to compare the cost-effectiveness of sibutramine (Meridia) plus a structured WMP versus only a structured WMP in both overweight and obese individuals. The core WMP was a physician-supervised, multidisciplinary program for which each enrollee paid Dollars 100 out of pocket. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed based upon the results of a previously published randomized controlled trial conducted within a managed care organization. The target population for this study was obese or overweight persons. The perspective of the study was that of a managed care organization. The intervention consisted of subjects receiving a WMP with or without sibutramine. The primary outcomes of this study were (a) absolute change in body weight and percentage change in body weight over 12 months, (b) change in obesity-related and total medical costs from 12 months prior to enrollment through 12 months after enrollment, and (c) cost-effectiveness in terms of cost per pound of weight loss. All costs were adjusted to 2004 dollars using the respective components of the consumer price index for each medical service or medication. RESULTS: A total of 501 evaluable subjects were enrolled in the study, with 281 receiving sibutramine plus a structured WMP and 220 receiving only the structured WMP. The meanSD weight loss was significantly greater in the sibutramine (13.715.5 pounds, 4.8%) group than in the nondrug group (513.2 pounds, 2.2%) (P < 0.001). The change in obesity-related total cost was a median increase of Dollars 408 for the sibutramine group compared with Dollars 31 for the nondrug group (P < 0.001). The change in total health care cost was a median Dollars 1,279 increase in the sibutramine group compared with Dollars 271 for the nondrug group (P < 0.001). Adding sibutramine to the WMP increased the total cost by Dollars 44 per additional pound of weight loss (95% confidence interval, 42-46). Sensitivity analyses found that the results were sensitive to the price of sibutramine, whereas varying the cost of clinic visits did not substantially change the results. CONCLUSION: Patients enrolled in a WMP receiving sibutramine had greater weight loss and decrease in body mass index at greater cost than did patients enrolled in the same program who did not receive sibutramine. There were no observed savings in total health care resource utilization or cost in the sibutramine group compared with the nondrug group.
机译:与体重管理程序(WMP)一起用于治疗肥胖症时药物治疗的成本效益。目的是比较西布曲明(Meridia)加结构化WMP与仅结构化WMP在超重和肥胖个体中的成本效益。 WMP的核心是医生监督的多学科计划,每个参与者都为此自掏腰包支付了100美元。方法:根据先前在管理的护理组织内进行的随机对照试验的结果进行了成本效益分析。这项研究的目标人群是肥胖或超重人群。研究的视角是管理式护理组织的视角。干预包括接受或不联合西布曲明的WMP受试者。这项研究的主要结果是(a)过去12个月内的体重绝对变化和体重百分比变化,(b)从入学前12个月到入学后12个月与肥胖相关的医疗费用和总医疗费用的变化,以及(c)就每磅减肥成本而言的成本效益。使用每种医疗服务或药物的消费者价格指数的各个部分,将所有费用调整为2004年的美元。结果:共有501名可评估受试者参加了研究,其中281名接受西布曲明加结构化WMP,而220名仅接受结构化WMP。西布曲明(13.715.5磅,4.8%)组的平均SD体重减轻明显高于非药物组(513.2磅,2.2%)(P <0.001)。与肥胖相关的总费用的变化是西布曲明组的中位数增加408美元,而非药物组的中位数增加了31美元(P <0.001)。西布曲明组的总医疗保健费用变化为中位数1,279美元,而非药物组为271美元(P <0.001)。在全脂奶粉中添加西布曲明后,每增加一磅减肥,总成本就会增加44美元(95%置信区间42-46)。敏感性分析发现,结果对西布曲明的价格敏感,而改变诊所就诊的费用并没有实质性改变结果。结论:加入西布曲明的WMP患者比未接受西布曲明的相同方案患者具有更大的体重减轻和体重指数下降。与非药物组相比,西布曲明组在整体卫生保健资源利用或成本方面均未见节省。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号