...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics: JMPT >Second Prize: The effectiveness of physical modalities among patients with low back pain randomized to chiropractic care: findings from the UCLA low back pain study.
【24h】

Second Prize: The effectiveness of physical modalities among patients with low back pain randomized to chiropractic care: findings from the UCLA low back pain study.

机译:二等奖:物理疗法在随机分配给脊椎治疗的下背痛患者中的有效性:来自UCLA下背痛研究的发现。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Although chiropractors often use physical modalities with spinal manipulation, evidence that modalities yield additional benefits over spinal manipulation alone is lacking. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to estimate the net effect of physical modalities on low back pain (LBP) outcomes among chiropractic patients in a managed-care setting. METHODS: Fifty percent of the 681 patients participating in a clinical trial of LBP treatment strategies were randomized to chiropractic care with physical modalities (n = 172) or without physical modalities (n = 169). Subjects were followed for 6 months with assessments at 2, 4, and 6 weeks and at 6 months. The primary outcome variables were average and most severe LBP intensity in the past week, assessed with numerical rating scales (0-10), and low back-related disability, assessed with the 24-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. RESULTS: Almost 60% of the subjects had baseline LBP episodes of more than 3 months' duration. The 6-month follow-up was 96%. The adjusted mean differences between groups in improvements in average and most severe pain and disability were clinically insignificant at all follow-up assessments. Clinically relevant improvements in average pain and disability were more likely in the modalities group at 2 and 6 weeks, but this apparent advantage disappeared at 6 months. Perceived treatment effectiveness was greater in the modalities group. CONCLUSIONS: Physical modalities used by chiropractors in this managed-care organization did not appear to be effective in the treatment of patients with LBP, although a small short-term benefit for some patients cannot be ruled out.
机译:背景:尽管脊椎按摩师经常在脊柱操纵中使用物理疗法,但尚缺乏证据表明这种疗法比单纯的脊柱操纵可获得更多好处。目的:本研究的目的是评估在管理治疗环境下,脊椎按摩治疗患者的物理模式对下腰痛(LBP)结果的净影响。方法:在参与LBP治疗策略临床试验的681例患者中,有50%被随机分配到有物理方式(n = 172)或无物理方式(n = 169)的脊椎按摩治疗中。随访受试者6个月,分别在2、4、6周和6个月进行评估。主要结局变量为过去一周的平均和最严重的LBP强度,使用数字评分量表(0-10)进行评估,低下背相关残疾,通过24项罗兰·莫里斯残疾问卷进行评估。结果:几乎60%的受试者基线LBP发作持续时间超过3个月。 6个月的随访率为96%。在所有随访评估中,两组之间平均和最严重疼痛和残疾改善的校正后平均差异在临床上均不显着。在模式组中,第2周和第6周,平均疼痛和残疾的临床相关改善可能性更大,但这种明显优势在6个月时消失。在模式组中,感知到的治疗效果更好。结论:尽管不能排除某些患者的短期获益,但在该管理型护理机构中,脊医所使用的物理方式似乎并不有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号