首页> 外文期刊>Journal of managed care pharmacy : >A 30-month evaluation of the effects on the cost and utilization of proton pump inhibitors from adding omeprazole OTC to drug benefit coverage in a state employee health plan.
【24h】

A 30-month evaluation of the effects on the cost and utilization of proton pump inhibitors from adding omeprazole OTC to drug benefit coverage in a state employee health plan.

机译:在州员工健康计划中,将奥美拉唑OTC添加到药物利益覆盖范围内,对质子泵抑制剂的成本和利用率的影响进行30个月的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: On March 1, 2004, the state employee health plan began covering omeprazole OTC (over the counter) at a Dollars 5 copayment. Reimbursement to pharmacy providers for omeprazole OTC increased by Dollars 10.50 per claim, from Dollars 2.50 to a Dollars 13 dispensing fee. Initially, neither generic omeprazole prescription (Rx) nor brand omeprazole Rx was covered because omeprazole OTC was available in the same strength as the Rx products at a lower cost, but an omeprazole OTC shortage necessitated coverage of generic omeprazole Rx at a Dollars 10 copay. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term financial impact of a drug benefit policy change on a mid-size state employee health plan and its beneficiaries associated with the addition to coverage of omeprazole OTC. METHODS: The pharmacy claims database for the employee benefits division (EBD) was used to examine utilization and cost data for beneficiaries who received proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Pharmacy claims for the 30-month period for dates of service from December 1, 2002, through May 31, 2005, were extracted from the database, yielding a preperiod of 15 months and a postpolicy change period of 15 months. RESULTS: In the 15-month postperiod, the number of PPI claims per member per month (PMPM) decreased by 3.9%, but the days of PPI therapy PMPM increased from 1.71 to 1.82 (6.4%). Price as measured by the allowed charge per day of drug therapy decreased from Dollars 4.25 to Dollars 2.74 (35.6%) despite an increase of Dollars 1.89 (76%) in the average dispensing paid per PPI claim to pharmacies, from Dollars 2.49 to Dollars 4.38. The average beneficiary copayment decreased by Dollars 0.50 (2.0%) per PPI claim, from Dollars 25.06 in the preperiod to Dollars 24.56 per claim in the postperiod. Therefore, the net heath plan cost for PPIs decreased by Dollars 2.20 PMPM (37.6%) during the 15-month postperiod, from Dollars 5.84 to Dollars 3.64 PMPM, producing savings of Dollars 4,207,350, or annualized savings of Dollars 3,365,880, in this employee benefit plan of 127,495 members. CONCLUSION: A change in policy to include coverage of omeprazole OTC and an increase in pharmacy reimbursement for omeprazole OTC resulted in 38% net savings to a state employee health plan. The large difference in drug acquisition cost between omeprazole OTC and the other Rx-only PPIs made it possible to implement a program intervention that provided financial benefit to pharmacists, beneficiaries, and the drug plan sponsor despite a 6% increase in PPI utilization.
机译:目的:2004年3月1日,州雇员健康计划开始以5美元的共付额承保奥美拉唑OTC(柜台交易)。奥美拉唑非处方药向药房供应商的报销,每项索赔增加了10.50美元,从2.50美元增加到13美元的配药费。最初,通用奥美拉唑处方药(Rx)和品牌奥美拉唑Rx均未涵盖在内,因为可以以较低的成本获得与Rx产品相同强度的奥美拉唑OTC,但是由于奥美拉唑OTC短缺,必须以10美元共付额承保通用奥美拉唑Rx。这项研究的目的是评估药品福利政策变更对中型国家雇员健康计划及其与奥美拉唑OTC覆盖范围相关的受益人的长期财务影响。方法:雇员福利部(EBD)的药房索赔数据库用于检查接受质子泵抑制剂(PPI)的受益人的利用率和成本数据。从数据库中提取了2002年12月1日至2005年5月31日的30个月服务期药房索赔,前期为15个月,政策变更后为15个月。结果:在15个月后的每个月,每个成员的PPI索赔数量(PMPM)下降了3.9%,但PPI治疗PMPM的天数从1.71增加到1.82(6.4%)。尽管每天每笔PPI索赔向药房支付的平均配药费用增加了1.89美元(76%),从每天药物治疗的允许费用衡量的价格从4.25美元降低至2.74美元(35.6%),从2.49美元降低至4.38美元。每个PPI索赔的平均受益人共付额减少了0.50美元(2.0%),从上一阶段的25.06美元减少到了后一阶段的24.56美元。因此,PPI的健康计划净成本在15个月后的期间减少了2.20 PMPM(37.6%),从5.84美元减少到3.64 PMPM,产生了4,207,350美元的节省,或3,365,880美元的年化节省127,495个成员的计划。结论:改变政策以包括奥美拉唑OTC的承保范围和奥美拉唑OTC药房费用的增加导致州雇员健康计划净节省38%。奥美拉唑OTC与其他仅Rx的PPI之间在药品购置成本上的巨大差异使实施计划干预成为可能,尽管PPI利用率提高了6%,但仍可为药剂师,受益人和药品计划发起人带来经济利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号