...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology: an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing >The usefulness of minimal ventricular pacing and preventive AF algorithms in the treatment of PAF: the 'MinVPace' study.
【24h】

The usefulness of minimal ventricular pacing and preventive AF algorithms in the treatment of PAF: the 'MinVPace' study.

机译:最小心室起搏和预防性AF算法在PAF治疗中的实用性:“ MinVPace”研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: The beneficial effects of atrial pacing on the incidence, duration and symptomatology of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) may be negated by increased ventricular pacing. This prospective randomised study evaluates the effect of pacing algorithms that minimise ventricular pacing (MinVP) with and without anti-AF algorithms, on AF burden (AFB) in patients with symptomatic PAF. METHODS: Patients implanted with pacemakers with MinVP capability with AFB 1-70% were enrolled. Three different DDDRP devices were assessed. Following a 1-month induction phase, patients were randomised to MinVP with and without preventive AF algorithms or dual chamber rate adaptive pacemaker (DDDR) (AV delay (AVD) 150 ms) for 2 months per study phase. The primary outcome measure was AFB. RESULTS: One hundred and ten patients were enrolled; of these, 66 (mean age 74.3 + or - 7.9, 56% males) had an AFB of 1-70% during the induction phase and completed all study phases. There was no significant difference in AFB between the control phase DDDR, 13.8% (95% CI 8.7 to 18.8), and MinVP, 14.4% (95% CI 9.4 to 19.4), or MinVP with AF algorithms enabled, 14.7% (95% CI 9.7 to 19.7), (p = 0.65 and p = 0.49, respectively). Median ventricular pacing was significantly higher during the control phase, 86.0% (IQR 72.8, 97.3), than in MinVP 2.0% (IQR 0.0, 14.1) and MinVP + algorithms 3.0% (IQR 0.4, 15.6), p = < 0.001. CONCLUSION: MinVP algorithms are effective in reducing ventricular pacing. However, there is no significant reduction in AFB with minimal ventricular pacing algorithms in the short term. No additional benefit or adverse outcome was found with preventative anti-AF algorithms in combination with MinVP algorithms.
机译:简介:心律起搏对阵发性心房颤动(PAF)的发生,持续时间和症状的有益影响可能被增加的心室起搏所抵消。这项前瞻性随机研究评估了在有症状的PAF患者中,有和没有抗AF算法的起搏算法(最小心室起搏(MinVP))对AF负担(AFB)的影响。方法:植入具有MinVP功能且AFB为1-70%的起搏器的患者。评估了三种不同的DDDRP设备。在1个月的诱导期后,在每个研究阶段,将患者随机分为有无预防性AF算法或无双室速率自适应起搏器(DDDR)(AV延迟(AVD)150 ms)的MinVP。主要结果指标是AFB。结果:招募了110例患者。其中有66名(平均年龄为74.3 +或-7.9,男性为56%)在诱导阶段的AFB为1-70%,并完成了所有研究阶段。在控制阶段DDDR的13.8%(95%CI 8.7至18.8)和MinVP的14.3%(95%CI 9.4至19.4)或启用了AF算法的MinVP的14.3%(95%)的AFB之间,AFB没有显着差异CI 9.7至19.7),(分别为p = 0.65和p = 0.49)。在控制阶段,中位心室起搏明显高于MinVP 2.0%(IQR 0.0,14.1)和MinVP +算法3.0%(IQR 0.4,15.6),为86.0%(IQR 72.8,97.3),p = <0.001。结论:MinVP算法可有效减少心室起搏。然而,短期内用最小的心室起搏算法并没有明显减少AFB。预防性抗AF算法与MinVP算法结合使用时,未发现其他益处或不利结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号