首页> 外文期刊>Journal of laparoendoscopic and advanced surgical techniques, Part A >Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus multiport laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: Analysis of 80 cases in a single center
【24h】

Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus multiport laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: Analysis of 80 cases in a single center

机译:单切口腹腔镜袖胃切除术与多端口腹腔镜袖胃切除术:单中心分析80例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Through efficacy and improved safety, multiport laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LAPS-G) has emerged as an important and broadly available treatment option for people with severe and complex obesity. Because a single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SILS-G) would be less invasive, we applied this novel surgical technique for a selected number of patients enrolled into our minimally invasive bariatric program. Subjects and Methods: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from 80 morbidly obese patients who qualified for SILS-G or LAPS-G was performed from January 2011 to May 2012. Results: SILS-G and LAPS-G were performed in 40 patients, respectively. All patients were female. Mean age was 41 (range, 19-73) years (SILS-G, 37 [19-62] years; LAPS-G, 43 [24-73] years; P=not significant). Preoperative body mass index was 40.8 (35.1-45.0) kg/m2 in the SILS-G group and 43.8 (35.0-47.8) kg/m2 in the LAPS-G group (P=not significant). Total operative time was significantly lower in the SILS-G group (85±21 minutes) compared with the LAPS-G group (97±26 minutes) (P.05). Median percentage excess weight loss was comparable in both groups (SILS-G, 57.2%; LAPS-G, 53.7%) at 6.6 months after surgery. Mean hospital stay was 5 days (SILS-G, 5 [4-24] days; LAPS-G, 6 [4-14] days; P=not significant). Complication rates were low in both groups: leakage, 2.5% in SILS-G and 0% in LAPS-G; bleeding, 2.5% in SILS-G and 2.5% in LAPS-G; and trocar-site hernia, 0% in both groups. Patients operated on with single-incision laparoscopy had a significantly better cosmetic outcome as assessed by a scar satisfaction assessment questionnaire (P.01). Conclusions: SILS-G is a feasible and safe operative procedure that leads to a significant reduction of total operative time compared with a multiport access procedure. Further potential benefits associated with single-incision laparoscopic surgery remain to be investigated objectively.
机译:背景:通过疗效和提高的安全性,多端口腹腔镜袖式胃切除术(LAPS-G)已成为重症和复杂肥胖患者的重要且广泛可用的治疗选择。由于单切口腹腔镜袖式胃切除术(SILS-G)的侵入性较小,因此我们将这种新颖的手术技术应用于入选微创减肥计划的选定患者中。研究对象和方法:回顾性回顾了2011年1月至2012年5月从80例符合SILS-G或LAPS-G的病态肥胖患者中收集的数据。结果:对40例患者进行了SILS-G和LAPS-G,分别。所有患者均为女性。平均年龄为41岁(19-73岁)(SILS-G为37 [19-62]岁; LAPS-G为43 [24-73]岁; P =不重要)。 SILS-G组术前体重指数为40.8(35.1-45.0)kg / m2,LAPS-G组术前体重指数为43.8(35.0-47.8)kg / m2(P =不显着)。与LAPS-G组(97±26分钟)相比,SILS-G组(85±21分钟)的总手术时间显着减少(P <.05)。术后6.6个月,两组中的超​​重损失百分比中位数在两组中均相当(SILS-G,57.2%; LAPS-G,53.7%)。平均住院时间为5天(SILS-G,5 [4-24]天; LAPS-G,6 [4-14]天; P =不显着)。两组并发症发生率均较低:渗漏,SILS-G组为2.5%,LAPS-G组为0%;出血,SILS-G为2.5%,LAPS-G为2.5%;和套管针疝,两组均为0%。通过疤痕满意度评估问卷评估,单切口腹腔镜手术患者的美容结局明显改善(P <0.01)。结论:SILS-G是一种可行且安全的手术程序,与多端口接入程序相比,可显着减少总手术时间。与单切口腹腔镜手术有关的其他潜在益处仍有待客观研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号