...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of laparoendoscopic and advanced surgical techniques, Part A >Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal malignancy: a preliminary report comparing the short-term outcomes with open adrenalectomy.
【24h】

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal malignancy: a preliminary report comparing the short-term outcomes with open adrenalectomy.

机译:腹腔镜肾上腺切除术治疗肾上腺恶性肿瘤的初步报告比较开放性肾上腺切除术的近期疗效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: The laparoscopic approach to adrenal malignancy remains a topic of debate. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients who had an open or laparoscopic adrenalectomy for malignancy at a tertiary care center from 1995 to 2005 were included in this study. RESULTS: Twenty-six cases were identified: 19 women and 7 men with a median age of 48 years (range, 20-81) underwent 12 open (8 adrenocortical carcinoma [ACC] and 4 metastases) and 14 laparoscopic adrenalectomies (5 ACC, 8 metastases, and 1 lymphoma). Conversion to open surgery was required in 1 laparoscopic case (7%). Cases with obvious invasion to adjacent organs were not approached laparoscopically. There was no difference in age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists status or diagnosis between the two groups, but patients in the laparoscopic group had a higher body mass index. Two patients required splenectomies for splenic tears in the open group. There was no difference in operative time between the two groups, but estimated blood loss (200 vs. 550 mL; P = 0.01) and hospital stay (2 vs. 7 days; P = 0.005) were less in the laparoscopic group. The size of tumors removed by open surgery was larger than by laparoscopy (8 vs. 4 cm; P = 0.003). No locoregional recurrences are reported so far in the laparoscopic group. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is both feasible and safe for some malignant tumors of the adrenal gland in experienced hands. However, it cannot be applied to all cases. Careful selection, preoperative staging, and respect for oncologic principles are important considerations in choosing laparoscopic surgery for primary and secondary adrenal malignancy. Short-term outcomes are better when the laparoscopic approach is possible. Confirmation and long-term results with further studies are required.
机译:背景:腹腔镜治疗肾上腺恶性肿瘤仍然是一个争论的话题。方法:回顾性分析1995年至2005年在三级护理中心因恶性肿瘤而开腹或腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的患者。结果:确定了26例病例:中位年龄为48岁(范围20-81)的19名女性和7名男性经历了12例开放(8例肾上腺皮质癌[ACC]和4例转移)和14例腹腔镜肾上腺切除术(5例, 8个转移灶和1个淋巴瘤)。 1例腹腔镜病例(7%)需要转换为开放手术。腹腔镜未处理明显侵犯邻近器官的病例。两组之间的年龄,性别,美国麻醉医师学会的地位或诊断没有差异,但是腹腔镜组的患者的体重指数较高。在开放组中,两名患者因脾脏撕裂而需要脾切除术。两组之间的手术时间没有差异,但是腹腔镜手术组的失血量(200 vs. 550 mL; P = 0.01)和住院时间(2 vs. 7天; P = 0.005)更少。通过开放式手术切除的肿瘤的大小大于腹腔镜检查(8 vs. 4 cm; P = 0.003)。迄今为止,腹腔镜组未见局部复发。结论:腹腔镜肾上腺切除术对于有经验的双手某些肾上腺恶性肿瘤既可行又安全。但是,它不能应用于所有情况。在选择腹腔镜手术治疗原发性和继发性肾上腺恶性肿瘤时,仔细选择,术前分期和尊重肿瘤学原则是重要的考虑因素。如果可以使用腹腔镜方法,短期结果会更好。需要进一步研究的确认和长期结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号