首页> 外文期刊>Journal of intensive care medicine >The GENESIS project (GENeralized early sepsis intervention strategies): A multicenter quality improvement collaborative
【24h】

The GENESIS project (GENeralized early sepsis intervention strategies): A multicenter quality improvement collaborative

机译:GENESIS项目(一般性败血症早期干预策略):多中心质量改进协作

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Improved outcomes for severe sepsis and septic shock have been consistently observed with implementation of early best practice intervention strategies or the 6-hour resuscitation bundle (RB) in single-center studies. This multicenter study examines the in-hospital mortality effect of GENeralized Early Sepsis Intervention Strategies (GENESIS) when utilized in community and tertiary care settings. Methods: This study was comprised of 2 strategies to assess treatment. The first was a prospective before-and-after observational comparison of historical controls to patients receiving the RB after implementation of GENESIS in 4 community and 4 tertiary hospitals. The second was a concurrent examination comparing patients not achieving all components of the RB to those achieving all components of the RB in 1 community and 2 tertiary care hospitals after implementation of GENESIS. These 4 subgroups merged to comprise a control (historical controls treated before GENESIS and RB not achieved after GENESIS) group and treatment (patients treated after GENESIS and RB achieved after GENESIS) group for comparison. Results: The control group comprised 1554 patients not receiving the RB (952 before GENESIS and 602 RB not achieved after GENESIS). The treatment group comprised 4801 patients receiving the RB (4109 after GENESIS and 692 RB achieved after GENESIS). Patients receiving the RB (treatment group) experienced an in-hospital mortality reduction of 14% (42.8%-28.8%, P <.001) and a 5.1 day decrease in hospital length of stay (20.7 vs 15.6, P <.001) compared to those not receiving the RB (control group). Similar mortality reductions were seen in the before-and-after (43% vs 29%, P <.001) or concurrent RB not achieved versus achieved (42.5% vs 27.2%, P <.001) subgroup comparisons. Conclusions: Patients with severe sepsis and septic shock receiving the RB in community and tertiary hospitals experience similar and significant reductions in mortality and hospital length of stay. These findings remained consistent when examined in both before-and-after and concurrent analyses. Early sepsis intervention strategies are associated with 1 life being saved for every 7 treated.
机译:背景:在单中心研究中,通过早期最佳实践干预策略或6小时复苏捆绑(RB)的实施,始终观察到严重败血症和败血性休克的预后得到改善。这项多中心研究检查了在社区和三级医疗机构中采用一般化早期脓毒症干预策略(GENESIS)的院内死亡率影响。方法:本研究包括两种评估治疗的策略。首先是对4所社区医院和4所三级医院实施GENESIS治疗后接受RB的患者的历史对照进行了前瞻性前后观察比较。第二项是同时检查,比较了在实现GENESIS之后,在1个社区和2家三级医院中未达到RB的所有组成部分的患者与达到RB的所有组成部分的患者。将这4个亚组合并为一个对照组(GENESIS之前治疗过的历史对照,GENESIS之后未达到RB)和治疗组(GENESIS之后治疗的患者,GENESIS之后获得RB)进行比较。结果:对照组包括1554例未接受RB的患者(952例(GENESIS之前)和602例RB未发生。治疗组包括4801例接受RB的患者(GENESIS后为4109例,GENESIS后为692例)。接受RB治疗的患者(治疗组)住院死亡率降低了14%(42.8%-28.8%,P <.001),住院时间减少了5.1天(20.7 vs 15.6,P <.001)与未接受RB的人(对照组)相比。在亚组比较之前和之后(43%比29%,P <.001)或未达到并发RB的死亡率相似(42.5%vs 27.2%,P <.001)。结论:在社区和三级医院接受RB的严重败血症和败血性休克患者的死亡率和住院时间都有相似且显着的降低。这些结果在前后分析和同时分析中均保持一致。早期的败血症干预策略与每治疗7条生命可挽救1条生命有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号