首页> 外文期刊>Journal of intensive care medicine >Vena caval filters: a review for intensive care specialists.
【24h】

Vena caval filters: a review for intensive care specialists.

机译:静脉腔过滤器:重症监护专家的评论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication among patients in the intensive care unit. While anticoagulation remains standard therapy, vena caval filters are an important alternative when anticoagulation is contraindicated. To determine the safety and efficacy of vena caval filters in the treatment of VTE, a comprehensive review of the English-language medical literature was performed. Except for one randomized controlled trial, the literature supporting the use of vena caval filters consists almost exclusively of case series, which in many instances are limited by incomplete and short follow-up. While case series suggest that filters function effectively in the prevention of pulmonary embolism (2%-4% symptomatic pulmonary embolism [PE], fatal PE < 2%), recent higher quality studies indicate that filters may not provide significant additional protection to that provided by anticoagulation alone. Furthermore, filters are associated with a 2- fold increase in the incidence of recurrent DVT. Until randomized comparative studies are available, the safety and efficacy of all the available devices should be considered to be roughly equivalent. Since filters do not inhibit continued clot formation, all filter patients should receive anticoagulation for durations appropriate for their thrombotic disorder. Although extended anticoagulation may prevent thrombotic complications associated with filter placement, this strategy has yet to be experimentally tested. While many additional indications for vena caval filter use have been proposed (VTE in cancer patients, PE prophylaxis in trauma patients, etc), well-designed clinical trials demonstrating their efficacy in these situations are lacking. Further development of temporary/retrievable filters, which offer the potential to avoid the long-term complications of permanent filters, should be a research priority. Until additional data are available, vena caval filters should generally be restricted to patients with VTE who cannot receive anticoagulation.
机译:静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)是重症监护病房患者的常见并发症。尽管抗凝仍然是标准疗法,但当禁忌抗凝时,腔静脉滤器是重要的替代选择。为了确定腔静脉滤器在治疗VTE中的安全性和有效性,对英语医学文献进行了全面回顾。除一项随机对照试验外,支持使用腔静脉滤过器的文献几乎全部由病例系列组成,在许多情况下,此类病例受到随访不充分和随访时间的限制。尽管案例系列表明过滤器可以有效地预防肺栓塞(2%-4%症状性肺栓塞[PE],致命性PE <2%),但最近的高质量研究表明,过滤器可能无法为肺栓塞提供明显的额外保护仅靠抗凝治疗。此外,过滤器与复发性DVT的发生率增加2倍有关。在获得随机比较研究之前,应将所有可用设备的安全性和有效性视为大致等效。由于过滤器不会抑制持续的血块形成,因此所有过滤器患者应在适合其血栓形成疾病的时间内接受抗凝治疗。尽管延长的抗凝治疗可以预防与滤器放置相关的血栓并发症,但该策略尚未进行实验测试。尽管已经提出了使用腔静脉滤器的许多其他适应症(癌症患者的VTE,创伤患者的PE预防等),但缺乏设计良好的临床试验来证明其在这些情况下的功效。临时/可回收过滤器的进一步开发应有可能避免永久过滤器的长期并发症,这应成为研究的重点。在没有其他数据可用之前,通常应将腔静脉滤器局限于不能接受抗凝治疗的VTE患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号