...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical nutrition >Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials.
【24h】

Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials.

机译:营养风险筛查(NRS 2002):一种基于对受控临床试验的分析的新方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND & AIMS: A system for screening of nutritional risk is described. It is based on the concept that nutritional support is indicated in patients who are severely ill with increased nutritional requirements, or who are severely undernourished, or who have certain degrees of severity of disease in combination with certain degrees of undernutrition. Degrees of severity of disease and undernutrition were defined as absent, mild, moderate or severe from data sets in a selected number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and converted to a numeric score. After completion, the screening system was validated against all published RCTs known to us of nutritional support vs spontaneous intake to investigate whether the screening system could distinguish between trials with a positive outcome and trials with no effect on outcome. METHODS: The total number of randomized trials identified was 128. In each trial, the group of patients was classified with respect to nutritional status and severity of disease, and it was determined whether the effect of nutritional intervention on clinical outcome was positive or absent. RESULTS: Among 75 studies of patients classified as being nutritionally at-risk, 43 showed a positive effect of nutritional support on clinical outcome. Among 53 studies of patients not considered to be nutritionally at-risk, 14 showed a positive effect (P=0.0006). This corresponded to a likelihood ratio (true positive/false positive) of 1.7 (95% CI: 2.3-1.2). For 71 studies of parenteral nutrition, the likelihood ratio was 1.4 (1.9-1.0), and for 56 studies of enteral or oral nutrition the likelihood ratio was 2.9 (5.9-1.4). CONCLUSION: The screening system appears to be able to distinguish between trials with a positive effect vs no effect, and it can therefore probably also identify patients who are likely to benefit from nutritional support.
机译:背景与目的:描述了一种用于筛查营养风险的系统。它基于以下概念:营养不良,营养严重不足,疾病严重程度与某种程度的营养不足相结合的患者,应给予营养支持。在选定数量的随机对照试验(RCT)中,从数据集中将疾病的严重程度和营养不良程度定义为不存在,轻度,中度或严重,并将其转换为数字评分。完成后,针对我们已知的所有营养支持和自发摄入量的RCT,对筛查系统进行了验证,以调查筛查系统是否可以区分阳性结果的试验和不影响结果的试验。方法:确定的随机试验总数为128。在每个试验中,根据营养状况和疾病严重程度对患者组进行分类,并确定营养干预对临床结局的影响是阳性还是阴性。结果:在75项被归类为处于营养风险中的患者研究中,有43项显示营养支持对临床结局具有积极作用。在53例不被认为营养风险高的患者研究中,有14例显示出积极效果(P = 0.0006)。这对应于1.7(95%CI:2.3-1.2)的似然比(真阳性/假阳性)。对于71项肠胃外营养研究,可能性比为1.4(1.9-1.0),而对于56项肠内或口服营养研究,可能性比为2.9(5.9-1.4)。结论:筛查系统似乎能够区分具有正面效果与没有效果的试验,因此它也可以识别出可能受益于营养支持的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号