首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Insect Physiology >Comparing electroantennogram and behavioral responses of two Pseudacteon phorid fly species to body extracts of Black, Red and Hybrid imported fire ants, Solenopsis spp.
【24h】

Comparing electroantennogram and behavioral responses of two Pseudacteon phorid fly species to body extracts of Black, Red and Hybrid imported fire ants, Solenopsis spp.

机译:比较两种假Pseudoacteon拟蝇蝇对黑色,红色和杂交进口火蚁Solenopsis spp的身体提取物的电造影和行为响应。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Several phorid fly species were introduced to the southern United States for biological control of the invasive imported fire ants, Solenopsis richteri (Black), Solenopsis invicta (Red), and their Hybrid S. richteri × S. invicta (Hybrid). It has been previously reported that the Jaguariuna biotype of Pseudacteon tricuspis and the Formosan biotype of Pseudacteon curvatus could distinguish among the three fire ant species with greater preference for Hybrid and Red fire ants. We hypothesized that phorid flies might use host derived chemical cues to differentiate ant species. To determine possible differential olfactory sensitivity of phorid fly species to different fire ant species, we compared electroantennogram (EAG) and behavioral responses of both sexes of P. tricuspis and P. curvatus to body extracts of Black, Red and Hybrid fire ants. As worker sizes of Black and Hybrid fire ants used in this study were much larger than that of Red fire ant (the average weight for Black, Red and Hybrid workers was 1.707, 0.863, 1.223 mg per ants, respectively), at doses of 0.01, 0.1, 1 worker equivalent, body extracts of Black and Hybrid fire ant elicited significantly greater EAG response in both sexes of P. tricuspis than that of Red fire ant. Similarly, the EAG response in female P. curvatus to body extract of Black fire ant was significantly greater than to body extract of Red fire ant. To eliminate worker size influence on EAG response in phorid flies, we conducted a second EAG study using a dose of 1 mg ant equivalent (body extract from 1 mg of worker). No difference in EAG responses was recorded to body extract obtained from the same amount of workers among the three fire ant species (we consider viable Hybrid fire ant as a species in this paper), suggesting that worker size differences contributed to difference in EAG response in the first EAG study. In both EAG studies, male P. tricuspis showed significantly greater EAG responses than male P. curvatus to all three fire ant species. In four-way olfactometer bioassay, worker body extracts of all three fire ant species were equally attractive to P. tricuspis and P. curvatus (i.e. both phorid fly species did not show any preferences among the three fire ant species). Together, the results of the EAG and behavior studies suggest that parasitic phorid flies utilize host derived non-polar compounds from worker ants extracted out by hexane for host location but not for host preference, since both fly species are not able to distinguish among the body extracts of the three fire ant species. Future study will investigate possible involvement of polar compounds and/or non-chemical cues in mediating host preference by phorid flies.
机译:几种类蝇蝇被引入美国南部,以对入侵的入侵火蚁进行生物控制,即:Solenopsis richteri(黑色),Senoenoss invicta(红色)及其杂交S. richteri×S. invicta(杂交)。以前有报道说,三尖峰假山梨的Jaguariuna生物型和弯弯曲丝假山梨的台湾生物型可以区分这三种火蚁种类,它们对杂种和红火蚁的偏爱更大。我们假设,类蝇可能使用宿主衍生的化学线索来区分蚂蚁物种。为了确定类蝇蝇对不同火蚁种类的可能的不同嗅觉敏感性,我们比较了三色对虾和黑对虾对黑,红和杂种火蚁体提取物的电性触角图(EAG)和行为反应。由于本研究中使用的黑火蚁和杂种火蚁的工人大小比红火蚁大得多(每只蚂蚁的黑,红和杂种工人的平均体重分别为1.707、0.863和1.223 mg),剂量为0.01与红火蚁相比,黑和杂种火蚁的身体提取物(0.1、1个工人当量)在两性对虾中引起的EAG响应明显更大。同样,雌性弯弯曲菌对黑火蚁的身体提取物的EAG反应明显大于对红火蚁的身体提取物的EAG反应。为了消除工人大小对类蝇中EAG反应的影响,我们进行了第二次EAG研究,使用1 mg蚂蚁当量(1 mg工人的身体提取物)剂量。在三种火蚁物种(我们认为可行的杂种火蚁为本文物种)中,从相同数量的工人身上获得的身体提取物的EAG反应没有记录差异,这表明工人大小的差异导致了EAG反应的差异。首次EAG研究。在这两个EAG研究中,对所有三种火蚁物种,雄性三头猴都比雄性弯头猴具有更大的EAG反应。在四向嗅觉生物测定法中,所有三种火蚁物种的工人身体提取物对三叶假单胞菌和弯曲疟原虫具有同样的吸引力(即,两种蝇蝇在这三种火蚁物种中均没有表现出任何偏爱)。 EAG和行为研究的结果相结合,表明寄生虫类蝇利用从己烷中提取的工蚁中的宿主衍生的非极性化合物进行宿主定位,而不是出于宿主偏爱,因为这两种蝇类均无法在体内进行区分三种火蚁物种的提取物。未来的研究将调查极性化合物和/或非化学提示在通过类蝇介导宿主偏爱中的可能作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号