首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hydrometeorology >Evaluation of reanalysis soil moisture simulations using updated Chinese soil moisture observations
【24h】

Evaluation of reanalysis soil moisture simulations using updated Chinese soil moisture observations

机译:使用更新的中国土壤水分观测值对再分析土壤水分模拟进行评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Using 19 yr of Chinese soil moisture data from 1981 to 1999, the authors evaluate soil moisture in three reanalysis outputs: the 40-yr European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Re-Analysis (ERA-40); the National Centers for Environmental Prediction-National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP-NCAR) reanalysis 1 (R-1); and the NCEP-Department of Energy (DOE) reanalysis 2 (R-2) over China. R-2 shows improved interannual variability and better seasonal patterns of soil moisture than R-1 as the result of the incorporation of observed precipitation, but not for all stations. ERA-40 produces a better mean value of soil moisture for most Chinese stations and good interannual variability. Limited observations in the spring indicate a spring soil moisture peak for most of the stations. ERA-40 generally reproduced this event, while R-1 or R-2 generally did not capture this feature, either because the soil was already saturated or the deep soil layer was too thick and damped such a response. ERA-40 and R-1 have a temporal time scale comparable to observations, but R-2 has a memory of nearly 5 months for the growing season, about twice the temporal scale of the observations. The cold season tends to prolong soil moisture memory by about 3 months for R-2 and I month for ERA-40. The unrealistic long temporal scale of R-2 can be attributed to the deep layer of the land surface model, which is too thick and dominates the soil moisture variability. R-1 has the same land surface scheme as R-2, but shows a temporal scale close to observations, which is actually because of soil moisture nudging to a fixed climatology. This new long time series of observed soil moisture will prove valuable for other studies of climate change, remote sensing, and model evaluation.
机译:作者使用1981年至1999年的19年中国土壤水分数据,通过三个再分析输出评估了土壤水分:40年欧洲中距离天气预报中心(ECMWF)再分析(ERA-40);以及40年欧洲中距离天气预报中心(ECMWF)重新分析。国家环境预测中心-国家大气研究中心(NCEP-NCAR)重新分析1(R-1);以及中国的NCEP-能源部(DOE)再分析2(R-2)。由于结合了观测到的降水,R-2的年际变异性和土壤水分的季节性模式均优于R-1,但并非所有站都如此。 ERA-40可以为大多数中国气象站提供更好的土壤湿度平均值,并具有良好的年际变化。春季的有限观测表明,大多数测站的春季土壤水分峰值。 ERA-40通常会重现此事件,而R-1或R-2通常无法捕捉到此功能,这是因为土壤已经饱和或深层土壤太厚而无法响应。 ERA-40和R-1的时间尺度与观测值相当,但R-2在生长季节的记忆时间将近5个月,约为观测值的两倍。寒冷季节倾向于将R-2的土壤水分记忆延长约3个月,而ERA-40则将土壤水分记忆延长1个月。 R-2的不现实的长时间尺度可能归因于陆地表面模型的深层,该层太厚并且支配着土壤水分的可变性。 R-1具有与R-2相同的陆地表面方案,但显示的时间尺度与观测值接近,这实际上是由于土壤湿度微不足道而固定的。这一新的长期观测到的土壤水分序列将被证明对其他气候变化,遥感和模型评估研究具有价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号