首页> 外文期刊>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology: the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association >Conservative management of esophageal perforations during pneumatic dilation for idiopathic esophageal achalasia.
【24h】

Conservative management of esophageal perforations during pneumatic dilation for idiopathic esophageal achalasia.

机译:气管扩张治疗特发性食管ach门失弛缓症的保守处理。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Esophageal perforation is the most serious adverse event of pneumatic dilation (PD) for achalasia; it is usually managed by surgical repair. We investigated risk factors for esophageal perforation after PD and evaluated safety and long-term outcome of nonsurgical management strategies.We analyzed medical records of patients with achalasia who were treated with PD from 1992-2010 at the University Hospital Gasthuisberg in Leuven, Belgium; all patients with esophageal perforation were contacted to determine long-term outcomes. Achalasia outcomes were assessed by using the Vantrappen criteria.Of 830 PD procedures performed on 372 patients with manometry-confirmed achalasia (57 ± 1 years, 51% male), 16 were complicated by transmural esophageal perforation (4.3% of patients, 1.9% of dilations). Age >65 years was the only significant risk factor for complications (odds ratio, 3.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-10.2). All patients were treated conservatively with broad-spectrum antibiotics and nothing by mouth. In 6 patients (38%) the clinical course was further complicated by a pleural effusion, which required a drain in 4 patients. One patient (6%) died of mediastinal hemorrhage within 12 hours after PD. Patients with complications were discharged after 19 ± 2.3 days, compared with 4 ± 0.2 days for those without complications (P < .0001). Long-term outcomes (mean follow-up, 84 ± 14 months) were determined for 12 patients (75%); 11 had excellent or good outcomes (69%), and 1 had a moderate outcome (6%).Age >65 years is a significant risk factor for esophageal perforation after PD. Nonsurgical management of transmural esophageal tears is feasible, with favorable short-term and long-term outcomes, but is not devoid of complications.
机译:食管穿孔是门扩张症最严重的不良反应。通常通过外科手术修复。我们调查了PD后食管穿孔的危险因素,并评估了非手术管理策略的安全性和长期结果。我们分析了1992-2010年在比利时鲁汶大学医院进行过PD治疗的门失弛缓患者的病历;与所有食管穿孔患者接触以确定长期结果。根据Vantrappen标准评估了hal门失弛缓的预后。在372例经压力测量确认的门失弛缓患者(57±1岁,男性51%)中进行的830次PD手术中,有16例并发了经壁食管穿孔(占患者的4.3%,占1.9%膨胀)。年龄> 65岁是发生并发症的唯一重要危险因素(优势比为3.5; 95%置信区间为1.2-10.2)。所有患者均接受了广谱抗生素的保守治疗,而没有口服药物。在6名患者(38%)中,胸腔积液进一步使临床过程复杂化,这需要4名患者进行引流。 PD后12小时内,一名患者(6%)死于纵隔出血。有并发症的患者在19±2.3天后出院,而没有并发症的患者则为4±0.2天(P <.0001)。确定了12例患者的长期预后(平均随访时间为84±14个月)(75%); 11例具有良好或良好的预后(69%),1例具有中度的预后(6%)。年龄> 65岁是PD后食管穿孔的重要危险因素。透壁食管泪液的非手术治疗是可行的,具有良好的短期和长期效果,但并非没有并发症。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号