首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydrology >Improving event-based rainfall-runoff modeling using a combined artificial neural network-kinematic wave approach
【24h】

Improving event-based rainfall-runoff modeling using a combined artificial neural network-kinematic wave approach

机译:结合人工神经网络-运动波方法改进基于事件的降雨径流模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The results of a study using a combined artificial neural network-kinematic wave (ANN-KW) approach to simulate event-based rainfall-runoff process are reported in this paper. Three types of ANN models were used, the first (NN_R) takes only measured rain as input, the second (NN_(RQ)) takes rain and estimated discharge obtained from a kinematic wave model assuming zero losses (KW_o) as input and the third (NN_Q) takes estimated discharge from the KW_o model only as input. The NN_R and NN_(RQ) model outputs were compared to assess improvements to ANN model predictions when estimated discharge is included as input to the ANN model. NN_Q model results were compared to a kinematic wave model (KW_c) which was modeled based on the loss rate of a calibration event. Three sets of rainfall-runoff data were used in the analyses; two obtained from an experimental station (completely impervious) and a third dataset from a real catchment. Using various performance measures, the results show that the NN_(RQ) model performed better than the NN_R model. Significantly, the NN_(RQ) model produced hydrographs that were smoother than those predicted by the NN_R model. The KW_c modeled hydrographs for the experimental station were close to the measured hydrographs because the loss rates in the experimental station were small. For the real catchment however, since the loss rates were large and varied significantly between events, the KW_c model was not able to produce the hydrographs from the catchment accurately. On the other hand, the NN_Q model was able to produce hydrographs that were much closer to the measured hydrographs.
机译:本文报道了使用组合的人工神经网络-运动波(ANN-KW)方法来模拟基于事件的降雨-径流过程的研究结果。使用了三种类型的ANN模型,第一种(NN_R)仅将测得的雨水作为输入,第二种(NN_(RQ))则采用雨水和从运动波模型获得的估计流量,其中假设零损耗(KW_o)为输入,第三种(NN_Q)仅将KW_o模型的估计流量作为输入。当将估计的排放量作为ANN模型的输入时,将NN_R和NN_(RQ)模型的输出进行比较,以评估对ANN模型预测的改进。将NN_Q模型结果与基于校准事件的损失率建模的运动波模型(KW_c)进行比较。分析中使用了三组降雨径流数据。两个是从实验站获得的(完全不透水的),另一个是来自实际流域的数据集。使用各种性能指标,结果表明NN_(RQ)模型的性能优于NN_R模型。重要的是,NN_(RQ)模型产生的水文曲线比NN_R模型预测的水文曲线更平滑。由于实验站的损失率很小,因此用于实验站的KW_c模拟水文图与实测水文图很接近。但是,对于实际集水区,由于损失率很大并且在事件之间损失显着变化,因此KW_c模型无法准确地从集水区生成水文图。另一方面,NN_Q模型能够生成更接近实测水文图的水文图。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号