首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydrology >Pumping-induced vadose zone drainage and storage in an unconfined aquifer: A comparison of analytical model predictions and field measurements
【24h】

Pumping-induced vadose zone drainage and storage in an unconfined aquifer: A comparison of analytical model predictions and field measurements

机译:无限制含水层中的抽水诱导渗流带排水和储水:分析模型预测值与现场测量值的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Analytical models used to analyze hydraulic head data from pumping tests incorporate boundary conditions defined along the water table to account for drainage from the overlying vadose zone. Although these boundary conditions do not explicitly describe the details of flow in the vadose zone, they do specify a bulk vadose zone response. We have quantified this response in terms of the cumulative drainage flux through the water table and undrained vadose zone storage. A comparison of bulk vadose zone response predicted by analytical models and inferred from field measurements was performed using hydraulic head data and soil moisture content profiles obtained during a seven day pumping test at CFB Borden, Ontario. Three different analytical models (one assuming instantaneous drainage and two types of delayed drainage using exponential decay functions) were used to predict the bulk vadose zone response from the hydraulic head measurements. The pumping test analyses using these models gave reasonable values for aquifer parameters, and the model predictions of the transient hydraulic head response replicated the observed hydraulic head data. However, there are significant differences between the model predictions and field observations of the bulk vadose zone response. The instantaneous drainage model entirety neglected the substantial undrained storage that was observed. In the vicinity of the pumping well, the delayed drainage models significantly overestimated the cumulative drainage flux and underestimated the undrained storage determined from the field data. The delayed drainage models predicted a relatively rapid dissipation of the undrained storage while the observed undrained storage exhibited little, if any, decay throughout the entire pumping test. Our results indicate that the water table boundary conditions used in these analytical models do not adequately replicate the mechanisms controlling the vadose zone behavior during a pumping test. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:用于分析抽水试验中的水头数据的分析模型结合了沿地下水位定义的边界条件,以说明从上方渗流带排出的水。尽管这些边界条件没有明确描述渗流区域中的流动细节,但它们确实指定了渗流区域的响应。我们已经根据通过地下水位的累积排水通量和不排水的渗流带存储对这种响应进行了量化。使用在安大略省CFB Borden进行的为期7天的抽水试验获得的水头数据和土壤水分含量分布图,对分析模型预测并由实地测量得出的大渗流带响应进行了比较。三种不同的分析模型(一种假设为瞬时排水,另一种为使用指数衰减函数的延迟排水)用于根据水头测量预测大渗流区的响应。使用这些模型进行的抽水测试分析为含水层参数提供了合理的值,瞬态水头响应的模型预测复制了观察到的水头数据。但是,模型预测与大渗流区响应的现场观察之间存在显着差异。瞬时排水模型整体忽略了观察到的大量不排水存储。在抽水井附近,延迟的排水模型大大高估了累积的排水通量,而低估了根据现场数据确定的不排水储量。延迟排水模型预测了不排水存储的相对快速消散,而观察到的不排水存储在整个抽水测试中几乎没有衰减。我们的结果表明,在这些分析模型中使用的地下水位边界条件不能充分复制抽水试验过程中控制渗流区行为的机制。 (c)2006 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号