首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydrology >Comparison of gage and multi-sensor precipitation estimates over a range of spatial and temporal scales in the Midwestern United States
【24h】

Comparison of gage and multi-sensor precipitation estimates over a range of spatial and temporal scales in the Midwestern United States

机译:美国中西部一系列时空尺度上的雨量计和多传感器降水估计的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

An intercomparison of radar-estimated precipitation and gage precipitation at a monthly time scale with a county spatial resolution was undertaken for a nine-state region of the Midwestern United States. Daily gage and radar-estimated precipitation data also were examined at the county and grid cell scale for several smaller regions. Precipitation data were collected from February 2002 to August 2005 from three sources: (1) gridded radar (stage II, RDR) and multi-sensor precipitation estimates (MPE) based on the stage III/IV algorithm developed by the Office of hydrology/NWS River Forecast Centers, (2) quality-controlled National Weather Service (NWS) cooperative gage (QC-Coop) data from the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), and (3) gage data from three high density networks in Illinois. Both the QC-Coop and high density gage data were employed as the reference standard. Sixty-four percent of QC_Coop versus MPE county-averaged monthly precipitation estimates agreed to within +/- 25%, with a median difference of 5.6% (QC_Coop greater than MPE) for the Midwest region. The difference between gage and MPE monthly values decreased somewhat through the 41-month period of study, and the correlation between monthly estimates increased, averaging 0.80. Data from three regional gage networks indicated that on a daily basis, network-averaged MPE and gage data also agreed to within about 25%, and the MPE values tended to be lower than gage amounts at higher precipitation values. When examining multiple gages within single MPE grid cells, it was found that the number of gages employed in computing the gage average did not appreciably affect the correspondence between MPE and gage precipitation amounts. This also was found examining monthly values at the county level. For daily precipitation at the grid cell scale, for daily networked-averaged precipitation for each of the regional networks, and for monthly county-averaged precipitation values across the Midwest, MPE values are often larger than gage values for lower gage precipitation totals, and as precipitation totals increase, MPE values are more likely to be the same or smaller than the gage value.
机译:在美国中西部的九州地区,将雷达估算的降水量和月降水量与县级空间分辨率进行了比较。在几个较小区域的县和网格单元范围内,还检查了日规和雷达估算的降水数据。 2002年2月至2005年8月从三个来源收集了降水数据:(1)栅格雷达(II,RDR阶段)和基于水文办公室/ NWS开发的III / IV阶段算法的多传感器降水估算(MPE)河流预报中心,(2)来自国家气候数据中心(NCDC)的质量控制的国家气象服务(NWS)合作计量(QC-Coop)数据,以及(3)来自伊利诺伊州三个高密度网络的计量数据。 QC-Coop和高密度量规数据均用作参考标准。 QC_Coop与MPE县平均月降水量估算的百分之六十四均在+/- 25%的范围内,中西部地区的中位数差异为5.6%(QC_Coop大于MPE)。在研究的41个月中,量具和MPE月度值之间的差异有所减少,月度估计值之间的相关性增加,平均为0.80。来自三个区域量具网络的数据表明,每天的网络平均MPE和量具数据也都在约25%的范围内,并且MPE值往往低于较高降水量值的量具。当检查单个MPE网格单元中的多个量具时,发现用于计算量具平均值的量具数量不会明显影响MPE与量具降水量之间的对应关系。还发现在检查县一级的月度值。对于网格单元规模的日降水量,每个区域网络的网络平均日降水量以及中西部地区的县级月平均降水量值,MPE值通常大于低降水量降水量总量的量具值,并且降水总量增加,MPE值更可能与标准值相同或更小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号