...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydrology >A comparison of baseflow indices, which were calculated with seven different baseflow separation methods
【24h】

A comparison of baseflow indices, which were calculated with seven different baseflow separation methods

机译:比较基础流量指数,这些指数是通过七种不同的基础流量分离方法计算得出的

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Baseflow indices for 65 North American catchments are compared, which were calculated with seven different baseflow separation methods (HYSEP1, HYSEP2, HYSEP3, PART, BFLOW, UKIH, and Eckhardt). Since the true values of the baseflow index are unknown, it cannot be said, which one of the methods gives the best estimates. However, the results of the Eckhardt method appear to be hydrologically more plausible than those of the other algorithms. Furthermore, this algorithm can be applied to hydrographs of any time step length. A simple technique for assessing the recession constant - one of the parameters of the algorithm - is presented. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:比较了65个北美流域的基础流量指数,这些指数是用7种不同的基础流量分离方法(HYSEP1,HYSEP2,HYSEP3,PART,BFLOW,UKIH和Eckhardt)计算得出的。由于基流索引的真实值是未知的,因此无法确定哪一种方法给出了最佳估计。但是,与其他算法相比,Eckhardt方法的结果在水文方面似乎更合理。此外,该算法可以应用于任何时间步长的水位图。提出了一种评估衰退常数的简单技术,该常数是算法的参数之一。 (c)2008 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号