...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydrology >The influence of flow inertia, buoyancy, wind, and flow unsteadiness on mixing at the asymmetrical confluence of two large rivers
【24h】

The influence of flow inertia, buoyancy, wind, and flow unsteadiness on mixing at the asymmetrical confluence of two large rivers

机译:两条大河非对称汇合处的水流惯性,浮力,风和水流不稳定性对混合的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The rates and patterns of mixing of two large rivers with large density differences at a strongly asymmetrical confluence in northern Spain are analyzed. We assess the factors controlling the site where the denser river plunges and the mixing rates between the rivers. In particular; we focus on the interaction between inertial and buoyancy forces, the effect of wind forcing, and the unsteady nature of the hydraulic forcing. The steady-state location of the plunge line is shown to be controlled by an inertia-buoyancy balance, which accounts for the relative magnitude of the buoyancy forcing associated with density differences between the confluent rivers, and the magnitudes of both the main-stream and the side-flow (tributary) inertia. The plunge line moves to upstream locations as the inertia of the tributary increases (for low tributary inertia) and/or the density contrast between the rivers increases. This has important consequences for river mixing since mixing rates increase as the plunging occurs at the confluence. The high mixing rates in this case occur as a result of a large mixing interface surface area and high diffusivities. As the plunging area moves upstream or downstream of the confluence, vertical diffusivities or the area of contact available for mixing decrease and constrain mixing rates. Wind forcing, depending on its velocity and direction, affects mixing rates through (1) altering the buoyancy-inertia equilibrium and so changing the location of the plunge line, (2) altering the pattern of secondary circulation within the confluence and/or (3) increasing shear at the confluence. Flow unsteadiness can lead to changes in the location of the plunge line through time and thus can strongly modify mixing rates at the confluence. The downstream movement of the plunge line is advection dominated, while its upstream movement seems to respond to a baroclinic response of the confluence. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:分析了西班牙北部强烈不对称交汇处两条密度差异较大的大河的混合速率和模式。我们评估了控制密度较大的河流骤降的地点以及河流之间的混合率的因素。特别是;我们将重点放在惯性力和浮力之间的相互作用,风强迫的影响以及水力强迫的不稳定特性上。示出了插入线的稳态位置由惯性-浮力平衡控制,该惯性-浮力平衡考虑了与汇合河之间的密度差相关的浮力强迫的相对大小,以及干流和干流的大小。侧流(支流)惯性。随着支流的惯性增加(对于低支流惯性)和/或河流之间的密度对比增加,下降线移至上游位置。这对河流混合具有重要的影响,因为随着汇合处的骤降,混合速率会增加。在这种情况下,由于大的混合界面表面积和高扩散率而产生了高混合速率。随着插入区域在汇合处的上游或下游移动,垂直扩散率或可用于混合的接触面积减小并限制了混合速率。强迫风取决于其速度和方向,它会通过以下方式影响混合速率:(1)改变浮力-惯性平衡,从而改变切入线的位置,(2)改变汇合处二次循环的模式和/或(3) )在汇合处增加剪切力。流量不稳定会导致插入管线位置随时间发生变化,因此会在汇合处强烈改变混合速率。滑入线的下游运动以对流为主,而其上游运动似乎是对汇合的斜压响应的响应。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号