首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydrology >The significance of model structure in one-dimensional stream solute transport models with multiple transient storage zones - competing vs. nested arrangements
【24h】

The significance of model structure in one-dimensional stream solute transport models with multiple transient storage zones - competing vs. nested arrangements

机译:模型结构在具有多个瞬态存储区的一维流溶质传输模型中的意义-竞争与嵌套布置

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Transient storage models are commonly used to simulate solute transport in streams to characterize hydrologic controls on biogeochemical cycling. Recently, 2-storage zone (2-SZ) models have been developed to represent in-channel surface transient storage (STS) and hyporheic transient storage (HTS) separately to overcome the limitations of single storage zone (1-SZ) models. To advance biogeochemical models, we seek to separate the effects of these storage zones on solute fate and cycling in streams. Here we compare and contrast the application and interpretations from two model structures that include STS and HTS storage: a competing model structure, where both zones are connected to the stream at the same location and the stream interacts with the STS and HTS separately, and a nested model structure, where STS is an intermediary between the stream and HTS. We adapt common residence time metrics used to compare single transient storage models for the competing and nested 2-SZ models. As a test case, we investigated the transient storage characteristics of a first-order stream in Pennsylvania, using 1-SZ, nested 2-SZ, and competing 2-SZ model configurations at several different flow conditions. While both 2-SZ models fit the observed STS and in-stream breakthrough curves well, calibrated model parameters and solute molecule travel paths differ, as evident by the faster exchange rate displayed by the nested model, and therefore so does the interpretation of associated transient storage metrics and its relationship with biogeochemical cycling processes. In addition, a study of hypothetical zone-specific reaction rates was very illustrative of the differences in discrimination characterized by each model structure, particularly for the case where reactions would predominantly occur in the STS (i.e. photochemical reactions), because of the compounding effects to the HTS for the nested 2-SZ; however, for the case where reactions would predominantly occur in the HTS, the influence of model structure was found to be relegated only to the HTS.
机译:瞬态存储模型通常用于模拟流中的溶质运移,以表征生物地球化学循环中的水文控制。近来,已经开发了2-存储区(2-SZ)模型来分别表示通道内表面瞬态存储(STS)和流变瞬态存储(HTS),以克服单个存储区(1-SZ)模型的局限性。为了推进生物地球化学模型,我们寻求分离这些存储区对溶质命运和河流中循环的影响。在这里,我们比较并对比了来自两个模型结构(包括STS和HTS存储)的应用程序和解释:竞争模型结构,其中两个区域都在同一位置连接到流,并且流分别与STS和HTS交互,并且嵌套模型结构,其中STS是流和HTS之间的中介。我们改编了用于比较竞争和嵌套2-SZ模型的单个瞬态存储模型的通用停留时间指标。作为测试案例,我们在几个不同的流量条件下,使用1-SZ,嵌套2-SZ和竞争性2-SZ模型配置研究了宾夕法尼亚州一阶流的瞬态存储特性。虽然两个2-SZ模型都很好地拟合了观察到的STS和流内突破曲线,但校准模型参数和溶质分子的传播路径有所不同,这可以从嵌套模型显示的更快的交换率中看出,因此相关瞬态的解释也是如此储存指标及其与生物地球化学循环过程的关系。此外,对假设的特定区域反应速率的研究非常说明了每种模型结构所具有的区分差异,特别是对于STS中主要发生反应(即光化学反应)的情况,因为嵌套2-SZ的HTS;但是,对于在HTS中主要发生反应的情况,发现模型结构的影响仅归因于HTS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号