...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydrology >Influence of residence time analyses on estimates of wetland hydraulics and pollutant removal
【24h】

Influence of residence time analyses on estimates of wetland hydraulics and pollutant removal

机译:停留时间分析对湿地水力估算和污染物去除的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Hydraulic tracer studies are frequently used to estimate wetland residence time distributions (RTDs) and ultimately pollutant removal. However, there is no consensus on how to analyse these data. We set out to (i) review the different methods used and (ii) use simulations to explore how the data analysis method influences the quantification of wetland hydraulics and pollutant removal. The results showed that the method influences the water dispersion (N) most strongly and the removal least strongly. The influence increased with decreasing effective volume ratio (e) and N, indicating a greater effect of the method in wetlands with low effective volume and high dispersion. The method of moments with RTD truncation at 3 times the theoretical residence time (t_n) and tracer background concentration produced the most dissimilar parameters. The most similar parameters values were those for gamma modelling and the method of moments with RTD truncation at tracer background concentration. For correct removal estimates, e was more important than N. However, the results from the literature review and simulations indicated that previously published articles may contain overestimated e and underestimated N values as a result of frequent RTD truncations at 3. t_n when using the method of moments. As a result, the removal rates may also be overestimated by as much as 14% compared to other truncation methods or modelling. Thus, it is recommended that wetland hydraulic tracer studies should use the same method, specifically, RTD truncation. We conclude that the choice of tracer data analysis method can greatly influence the quantifications of wetland hydraulics and removal rate.
机译:水力示踪剂研究通常用于估算湿地停留时间分布(RTD)并最终去除污染物。但是,关于如何分析这些数据尚未达成共识。我们着手(i)审查所使用的不同方法,以及(ii)使用模拟来探索数据分析方法如何影响湿地水力学的量化和污染物去除。结果表明,该方法对水分散度(N)的影响最大,对去除的影响最小。随着有效体积比(e)和N的降低,影响增大,表明该方法在有效体积低,分散度高的湿地中效果更大。 RTD截断的方法在理论停留时间(t_n)的3倍和示踪剂背景浓度下产生的参数最不相似。最相似的参数值是用于gamma建模的参数值以及在示踪剂背景浓度下RTD截断的矩方法。对于正确的去除量估计值,e比N更重要。但是,文献综述和模拟结果表明,由于使用该方法时,RTD经常在3. t_n处被频繁截断,因此先前发表的文章可能包含高估的e和低估的N值。的时刻。结果,与其他截断方法或建模相比,去除率也可能被高估了14%。因此,建议湿地水力示踪剂研究应使用相同的方法,特别是RTD截断法。我们得出结论,示踪剂数据分析方法的选择会极大地影响湿地水力的量化和去除率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号