...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydrology >Regional estimation of base flow and groundwater recharge in the Upper Mississippi river basin
【24h】

Regional estimation of base flow and groundwater recharge in the Upper Mississippi river basin

机译:密西西比河上游流域基础流量和地下水补给量的区域估算

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Groundwater recharge and discharge (base flow) estimates from two methods were compared in the Upper Mississippi River basin (USGS hydrologic cataloging unit 07). The Upper Mississippi basin drains 491,700 km(2) in Illinois, Iowa, Missouri, Minnesota, and Wisconsin and outlets in the Mississippi River north of Cairo, Illinois. The first method uses the water balance components from the soil and water assessment tool model (SWAT). The model was used to simulate the daily water balance of approximately 16 soil/land use hydrologic response units (HRU) within each of the 131 USGS 8-digit watersheds. The water balance of each HRU is simulated with four storages: snow, soil (up to ten layers), shallow aquifer, and deep aquifer, Groundwater recharge is defined as water that percolates past the bottom soil layer into the shallow aquifer. Recharge is lagged to become base flow and can also be lost to ET. The second method consists of two procedures to estimate base flow and recharge from daily stream flow: (1) a digital recursive filter to separate base flow from daily flow and (2) a modified hydrograph recession curve displacement technique to estimate groundwater recharge. These procedures were applied to 283 USGS stations ranging in area from 50 to 1200 km(2). A smoothed surface was obtained using a thin plate spline technique and estimates were averaged for each 8-digit basin, Simulated flow was calibrated against average annual flow for each 8-digit. Without further calibration, simulated monthly stream flow was compared against measured flow at Alton, Illinois (445,000 km(2)) from 1961-1980. To validate the model, measured and simulated monthly stream flow at Alton from 1981-1985 were compared with an R-2 of 0.65. No attempt was made to calibrate base flow and recharge independent of total stream flow. Base flow and recharge from both methods were shown to be in general agreement. The filter and recession methods have the potential to provide realistic estimates of base how and recharge for input into regional groundwater models and as a check for surface hydrologic models. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. [References: 56]
机译:在密西西比河上游流域(美国地质调查局水文目录单位07)比较了两种方法的地下水补给量(基础流量)估算值。密西西比河上游流域在伊利诺伊州,爱荷华州,密苏里州,明尼苏达州和威斯康星州的排水量为491,700 km(2),在伊利诺伊州开罗以北的密西西比河中则有排水口。第一种方法使用土壤和水评估工具模型(SWAT)中的水平衡成分。该模型用于模拟131个USGS 8位流域中每个流域内大约16个土壤/土地利用水文响应单位(HRU)的每日水平衡。每个HRU的水量平衡都是用四个存储来模拟的:雪,土壤(最多十层),浅层含水层和深层含水层。地下水补给的定义是渗出水,从底部土壤层渗入浅层含水层。补给滞后成为基本流量,也可能丢失给ET。第二种方法包括两个程序,可从日流量中估算基本流量和补给量:(1)数字递归过滤器,可将日流量和基本流量分开;(2)改进的水位仪后退曲线位移技术可估算地下水的补给量。这些程序应用于283个USGS站,范围从50到1200 km(2)。使用薄板样条技术获得平滑的表面,并对每个8位数字的盆地进行平均估计,并针对每个8位数字的年平均流量对模拟流量进行校准。在没有进一步校准的情况下,将模拟的每月水流与伊利诺伊州奥尔顿(1961-1980)的实测水流(445,000 km(2))进行了比较。为了验证该模型,将1981-1985年在奥尔顿的实测和模拟月流与R-2为0.65进行了比较。没有尝试独立于总流来校准基本流量和补给。两种方法的基本流量和补给量基本一致。过滤和衰退方法有可能提供基本方法和补给的实际估计,以输入区域地下水模型并作为对地表水文模型的检验。由Elsevier Science B.V.发布[参考:56]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号