...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of health politics, policy and law >Using the Courts to Shape Medicaid Policy: Olmstead v. L.C. by Zimring and Its Community Integration Legacy
【24h】

Using the Courts to Shape Medicaid Policy: Olmstead v. L.C. by Zimring and Its Community Integration Legacy

机译:利用法院制定医疗补助政策:Olmstead诉L.C.由Zimring及其社区融合遗产

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In Olmstead v. L.C. by Zimring, the United States Supreme Court addressed the relationship between the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), a landmark in US civil rights law, and the Medicaid program. Olmstead holds that qualified individuals with disabilities who are protected by the ADA have the right to receive publicly funded services in community-integrated treatment settings and that medically unnecessary institutionalization violates the ADA. But the Court had to wrestle with the extent to which the ADA requires state Medicaid programs to make deep and structural reforms in how long-term care services are organized, financed, and delivered. From a strictly legal perspective, Olmstead's impact has been limited by the fact that the ADA does not require fundamental alterations in public programs. Despite this fact, Olmstead remains a watershed decision in US disability law that has helped spur transformational changes in how Medicaid addresses community-based long-term care.
机译:在Olmstead诉L.C.由美国最高法院(Zimring)撰写的美国最高法院审理了美国民权法具有里程碑意义的《美国残疾人法》(ADA)与医疗补助计划之间的关系。奥姆斯特德(Olmstead)认为,受ADA保护的合格残疾人有权在社区综合治疗环境中接受公共资助的服务,而医疗上不必要的制度化违反了ADA。但是法院不得不在ADA要求州医疗补助计划在多大程度上对长期护理服务的组织,融资和提供方式进行深刻和结构性改革的问题上作斗争。从严格的法律角度来看,Olmstead的影响受到了事实的限制,即ADA不需要在公共计划中进行根本性的改动。尽管如此,奥尔姆斯特德仍然是美国残疾法中的分水岭,这有助于刺激医疗补助如何解决基于社区的长期护理的变革。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号