...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of human hypertension >Epidemiological, pathophysiological and clinical significance of systolic, diastolic and pulse pressure.
【24h】

Epidemiological, pathophysiological and clinical significance of systolic, diastolic and pulse pressure.

机译:收缩压,舒张压和脉压的流行病学,病理生理学和临床意义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Long-term population surveys and studies of untreated hypertensive patients both strongly suggest that over the age of about 45, the height of the systolic blood pressure is a better predictor of cardiovascular outcome than the diastolic pressure. Research into echocardiographic left ventricular size, endothelial function and thromborheology also back up this supposition. In clinical practice, the treatment of isolated systolic hypertension has been shown to be very worthwhile. There remains some uncertainty as to the relative significance of diastolic blood pressure when it is frankly high, as in severe systo-diastolic hypertension. However some clinicians and epidemiologists have questioned whether diastolic pressure is still worth measuring, given the overwhelming importance of the height of the systolic blood pressure at predicting outcome.
机译:长期的人口调查和未经治疗的高血压患者的研究均强烈表明,在约45岁以上,收缩压的高度比舒张压更好地预测了心血管预后。对超声心动图左心室大小,内皮功能和血栓流变学的研究也支持这种假设。在临床实践中,孤立的收缩期高血压的治疗已被证明是非常值得的。坦白地说,如在严重的收缩期舒张期高血压中,舒张压的相对重要性仍存在一些不确定性。然而,考虑到收缩压的高度对预测结局的重要性,一些临床医生和流行病学家质疑舒张压是否仍然值得测量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号