...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of health, population, and nutrition >Income is a stronger predictor of mortality than education in a national sample of US adults
【24h】

Income is a stronger predictor of mortality than education in a national sample of US adults

机译:在美国成年人样本中,收入比教育更能预测死亡率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Low socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with mortality in several populations. SES measures, such as education and income, may operate through different pathways. However, the independent effect of each measure mutually adjusting for the effect of other SES measures is not clear. The association between poverty-income ratio (PIR) and education and all-cause mortality among 15,646 adults, aged >20 years, who participated in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in the USA, was examined. The lower PIR quartiles and less than high school education were positively associated with allcause mortality in initial models adjusting for the demographic, lifestyle and clinical risk factors. After additional adjustment for education, the lower PIR quartiles were still significantly associated with all-cause mortality. The multivariable odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] of all-cause mortality comparing the lowest to the highest quartile of PIR was 2.11 (1.52-2.95, p trend≤0.0001). In contrast, after additional adjustment for income, education was no longer associated with all-cause mortality [multivariable OR (95% CI) of all-cause mortality comparing less than high school to more than high school education was 1.05 (0.85-1.31, p trend=0.57)]. The results suggest that income may be a stronger predictor of mortality than education, and narrowing the income differentials may reduce the health disparities.
机译:低社会经济地位(SES)与几个人群的死亡率有关。 SES措施,例如教育和收入,可能通过不同的途径发挥作用。但是,尚不清楚每种措施相互独立调整以适应其他SES措施的效果。研究了参加美国第三次全国健康与营养调查的15646名年龄大于20岁的成年人的贫困收入比(PIR)与教育和全因死亡率之间的关联。在针对人口,生活方式和临床风险因素进行调整的初始模型中,较低的PIR四分位数和低于高中教育程度与全因死亡率呈正相关。经过教育方面的进一步调整后,较低的PIR四分位数仍与全因死亡率密切相关。与最低至最高四分位数的PIR相比,全因死亡率的多变量比值比(OR)[95%置信区间(CI)]为2.11(1.52-2.95,p趋势≤0.0001)。相比之下,在对收入进行其他调整之后,教育不再与全因死亡率相关[全日制死亡率的多变量OR(95%CI)与高中以下和高中以上相比为1.05(0.85-1.31, p趋势= 0.57)]。结果表明,收入可能是死亡率比教育程度更强的预测指标,缩小收入差异可能会缩小健康差距。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号