首页> 外文期刊>Journal of infection and public health. >Did pandemic preparedness aid the response to pandemic (H1N1) 2009? A qualitative analysis in seven countries within the WHO European Region
【24h】

Did pandemic preparedness aid the response to pandemic (H1N1) 2009? A qualitative analysis in seven countries within the WHO European Region

机译:大流行的防范措施是否有助于应对2009年H1N1大流行?对世卫组织欧洲区域内七个国家的定性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Although the 2009-2010 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic was of low severity compared with other pandemics of the 20th century, this pandemic was the first opportunity for countries to implement a real-life pandemic response. The aim of the project was to review the extent to which these plans and planning activities proved useful and to identify areas of pandemic planning that require further strengthening. Methods: We randomly selected seven countries within the WHO European Region to participate in a comprehensive, qualitative study to evaluate the pandemic preparedness activities undertaken prior to March 2009 compared with the subsequent pandemic responses mounted from May 2009 onwards. Research teams visited each country and interviewed stakeholders from health and civil response ministries, national public health authorities, regional authorities and family and hospital doctors. Results: The following six consistent themes were identified as essential elements of successful pandemic preparedness activities: communication, coordination, capacity building, adaptability/flexibility, leadership and mutual support. Regarding future pandemic preparedness activities, an emphasis on these areas should be retained and planning for the following activities should be improved: communication (i.e., with the public and health professionals); coordination of vaccine procurement and logistics; flexibility of response and hospital surveillance. Conclusions: Pandemic preparedness activities were successfully undertaken in the WHO European Region prior to the 2009 pandemic. These activities proved to be effective and were generally appropriate for the response provided in 2009. Nevertheless, consistent themes also emerged regarding specific areas of under planning that were common to most of the surveyed countries.
机译:背景:尽管与20世纪其他大流行相比,2009-2010年甲型H1N1流感大流行的严重程度较低,但这种大流行是各国实施现实生活中的大流行应对措施的第一个机会。该项目的目的是审查这些计划和规划活动被证明有用的程度,并确定需要进一步加强的大流行规划领域。方法:我们随机选择了世卫组织欧洲区域内的七个国家,参加了一项全面的定性研究,以评估2009年3月之前开展的大流行防范活动以及随后的2009年5月以来的大流行应对措施。研究小组访问了每个国家,并采访了卫生和民政部,国家公共卫生当局,区域当局以及家庭和医院医生的利益相关者。结果:以下六个一致的主题被确定为成功的大流行防范活动的基本要素:沟通,协调,能力建设,适应性/灵活性,领导能力和相互支持。关于未来的大流行防范活动,应继续强调这些领域,并应改进以下活动的计划:交流(即与公众和卫生专业人员的交流);协调疫苗的采购和后勤;反应和医院监测的灵活性。结论:在2009年大流行之前,世卫组织欧洲区域已成功开展了大流行防范活动。这些活动被证明是有效的,并且通常适合于2009年提供的响应。尽管如此,在大多数被调查国家所共有的正在规划中的具体领域也出现了一致的主题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号