首页> 外文期刊>Journal of infection and chemotherapy: official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy >A change in the effectiveness of amantadine for the treatment of influenza over the 2003-2004, 2004-2005, and 2005-2006 influenza seasons in Japan.
【24h】

A change in the effectiveness of amantadine for the treatment of influenza over the 2003-2004, 2004-2005, and 2005-2006 influenza seasons in Japan.

机译:日本在2003-2004年,2004-2005年和2005-2006年流感季节中,金刚烷胺治疗流感的效力发生了变化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A retrospective study of the 2003-2004, 2004-2005, and 2005-2006 influenza seasons was done to investigate the effectiveness of amantadine and oseltamivir for treating influenza A. Commercial antigen detection kits were used for diagnosis and data were collected from 44 clinics throughout Japan, using an Internet-based system. Oseltamivir was administered to 2775 patients and amantadine to 781 patients. The durations of fever, from the time of the first drug administration and from the onset of fever, were calculated for each patient. In the 2005-2006 season, the duration of fever from the first drug administration was longer for patients who received amantadine than for those who received oseltamivir when the patients were grouped by the time from onset of fever to the start of treatment (P < 0.001 for groups administered at 0-12, 13-24, 25-36 h from the onset) and by patient age (P < 0.001 for under 16 years and P < 0.05 for 16-64 years). Mean values of duration of fever from the first drug administration were 31.3 h, 31.3 h, and 31.9 h for oseltamivir therapy, and 33.3 h, 42.7 h, and 53.3 h for amantadine therapy, in the 2003-2004, 2004-2005, and 2005-2006 seasons, respectively. Reduction in the effectiveness of amantadine over the three influenza seasons were also observed in each age group of 0-6, 7-15, and 16-64 years. The studied season was an independent factor associated with the effectiveness of amantadine by multiple regression analysis. In conclusion, the effectiveness of oseltamivir did not change, but the effectiveness of amantadine was progressively reduced over the three influenza seasons.
机译:对2003-2004年,2004-2005年和2005-2006年流感季节进行了回顾性研究,以调查金刚烷胺和奥司他韦治疗A型流感的有效性。使用商业抗原检测试剂盒进行诊断,并从整个44家诊所收集了数据日本,使用基于Internet的系统。奥司他韦治疗2775例,金刚烷胺治疗781例。从每位患者的首次给药时间到发烧开始计算发烧持续时间。在2005-2006赛季,按金刚烷胺分组的患者从发烧开始到开始治疗时的分组时间相比,接受金刚烷胺治疗的患者的发热持续时间要长于接受奥司他韦的患者(P <0.001对于在发病后0-12、13-24、25-36小时给药的组),并按患者年龄分组(16岁以下P <0.001,16-64岁P <0.05)。在2003-2004年,2004-2005年和2004年之间,奥司他韦治疗的平均发热持续时间分别为31.3小时,31.3小时和31.9小时,金刚烷胺治疗分别为33.3小时,42.7小时和53.3小时。 2005-2006赛季。在每个0-6岁,7-15岁和16-64岁年龄段的三个流感季节中,金刚烷胺的有效性也有所降低。通过多元回归分析,研究季节是与金刚烷胺有效性相关的独立因素。总之,奥司他韦的有效性没有改变,但金刚烷胺的有效性在三个流感季节中逐渐降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号