首页> 外文期刊>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth: JGR >Reply to comment by S. A. Shapiro on 'Role of seepage forces on seismicity triggering'
【24h】

Reply to comment by S. A. Shapiro on 'Role of seepage forces on seismicity triggering'

机译:回答S. A. Shapiro关于“渗透力在地震活动触发中的作用”的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Recently it has been argued that temporal evolution of seismicity triggering fronts is best described by a cube-root with time,t~(1/3), which is predicted for linear poroelastic rock.For real randomly distributed (heterogeneous) rock t~(1/2) is more appropriate,because a linear diffusion is a dominant triggering-front mechanism [Shapiro, 2012].In this reply I demonstrate that as long as Coulomb stress transfer is the valid triggering mechanism [King et al.,1994;Stein, 1999;Freed,2005;Steacv et al., 2005] and diffusion is linear in heterogeneous rock [Shapiro, 2012], then the seismicity triggering front should be scaled as t~(1/x) with x≥2.Thus,for any observed seismicity front scaling with x > 2 one cannot conclude that the diffusion is nonlinear, even in the case when poroelastic effects are neglected. Also, I demonstrate that in poroelastic rock the seismicity triggering front can be scaled with coefficient 3≥x > 2.
机译:最近有论点认为,地震触发前沿的时间演化最好用具有时间t〜(1/3)的立方根来描述,这对于线性多孔弹性岩石是预测的。对于真实随机分布(非均质)岩石t〜( 1/2)更合适,因为线性扩散是主导的触发前机制[Shapiro,2012]。在此答复中,我证明只要库仑应力传递是有效的触发机制[King等,1994; Stein,1999; Freed,2005; Steacv等,2005],并且在非均质岩石中扩散是线性的[Shapiro,2012],那么地震活动触发前沿应定为t≥(1 / x),且x≥2。 ,对于x> 2的任何观察到的地震活动性前尺度,即使忽略了孔隙弹性效应,也不能得出扩散是非线性的结论。此外,我证明了在多孔弹性岩石中,地震活动性触发前沿可以用系数3≥x> 2进行缩放。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号